Effect of different cavity designs and CAD/CAM blocks on fracture resistance of maxillary premolars with MOD cavities

St-George AJ, Sturdevant JR, Swift EJ Jr, et al. Fracture resistance of prepared teeth restored with bonded inlay restorations. J Prosthet Dent. 2003;89(6):551–7.

Article  Google Scholar 

Mei M, Chen Y, Li H, et al. Influence of the indirect restoration design on the fracture resistance: a finite element study. BioMed Eng OnLine. 2016;15(1):3–8.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Miyazaki A, Hotta T, Kunii Y, et al. A review of dental CAD/CAM: current status and future perspectives from 20 years of experience. Dent Mater J. 2009;28(1):44–56.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ausiello P, Ciaramella S, Fabianelli A, et al. Mechanical behavior of bulk direct composite versus block composite and lithium disilicate indirect Class II restorations by CAD-FEM modeling. Dent Mater. 2017;33(6):690–701.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Hallmann L, Ulmer P, Kern M. Effect of microstructure on the mechanical properties of lithium disilicate glass-ceramics. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2018;82:355–70.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Sonmez N, Gultekin P, Turp V, et al. Evaluation of five CAD/CAM materials by microstructural characterization and mechanical tests: a comparative in vitro study. BMC Oral Health. 2018;5(1):18–28.

Google Scholar 

Goujat A, Abouelleil H, Colon P, Jeannin C, et al. Mechanical properties and internal fit of 4CAD-CAM block materials. J Prosthet Dent. 2018;119(3):384–9.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Yang H, Park C, Shin JH, Yun KD, et al. Stress distribution in premolars restored with inlays or onlays: 3D finite element analysis. J Adv Prosthodont. 2018;10(3):184–90.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Gracis S, Thompson VP, Ferencz JL, et al. A new classification system for all-ceramic and ceramic-like restorative materials. Int J Prosthodont. 2015;28(3):227–35.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Quinn JB, Quinn GD. Material properties and fractography of an indirect dental resin composite. Dent Mater. 2010;26(6):589–99.

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Phan AC, Tang ML, Nguyen JF, et al. High temperature high-pressure polymerized urethane dimethacrylate mechanical properties and monomer release. Dent Mater. 2014;30(3):350–6.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Sadighpour L, Geramipanah F, Raeesi B. In vitro mechanical tests for modern dental ceramics. J Dent Tehran Univ Med Sci. 2006;3(3):143–52.

Google Scholar 

Wafaie R, Ibrahim A, Mahmoud S. Fracture resistance of prepared premolars restored with bonded new lab composite and all-ceramic inlay/onlay restorations: laboratory study. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2018;30(3):229–39.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Faul F, Erdfelder E, Lang AG, et al. G* Power 3: a flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences.". Behav Res Methods. 2007;39(2):175–91.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Channarong W, Lohawiboonkij N, Jaleyasuthumkul P, et al. Fracture resistance of bonded ceramic overlay restorations prepared in various designs. Sci Rep. 2022;12(1):16599.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Nassar Y, El-Sayed H, Salama M, et al. Fracture resistance of teeth restored with composite resin versus ceramic CAD/CAM inlays. J Dental Med Sci. 2022;15(4):2279–861.

Google Scholar 

Harsha M, Praffulla M, Babu M, et al. The effect of cavity design on fracture resistance and failure pattern in monolithic zirconia partial coverage restorations - an in vitro study. J Clin Diagn Res. 2017;11(5):25305–9856.

Google Scholar 

Chen Y, Chen D, Ding H, et al. Fatigue behavior of endodontically treated maxillary premolars with MOD defects under different minimally invasive restorations. Clin Oral Invest. 2022;14(5):03991–9.

Google Scholar 

Burke FJ, Wilson NH, Watts DC. The effect of cavity wall taper on fracture resistance of teeth restored with resin composite inlays. Oper Dent. 1993;18(6):230–6.

CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Lu Y, de Oliveira Dal Piva AM, Tribst JPM, et al. Does glaze firing affect the strength of advanced lithium disilicate after simulated defects? Clin Oral Investig. 2023;27(11):6429–38.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Morgan M. Finishing and polishing of direct posterior resin restorations. Pract Proced Aesthet Dent. 2004;16(3):211–7.

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Esquivel-Upshaw JF, Anusavise KJ. Ceramic design concepts based on stress distribution analysis. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2000;21(8):649–52.

CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Çakmak G, Subaşı MG, Yilmaz B. Effect of thermocycling on the surface properties of resin-matrix CAD-CAM ceramics after different surface treatments. J Mech Behav Biomed Mater. 2021;117:104401.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

R Core Team (2023). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. 13(5)1031–442.

Opdam N, Frankenberger R, Magne P. From “direct versus indirect” toward an integrated restorative concept in the posterior dentition. Oper Dent. 2016;41(S7):S27–34.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Edelhoff D, Sorensen JA. Tooth structure removal associated with various preparation designs for posterior teeth. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2022;22(3):241–9.

Google Scholar 

LeSage BP. CAD/CAM: applications for transitional bonding to restore occlusal vertical dimension. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2020;32(2):132–40.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

De Freitas CR, Miranda MI, de Andrade MF, et al. Resistance to maxillary premolar fractures after restoration of Class II preparations with resin composite or ceromer. Quintessence Int. 2022;33(8):589–94.

Google Scholar 

Widmalm SE, Ericsson SG. Maximal bite force with centric and eccentric load. J Oral Rehabil. 1982;9(5):445–50.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Panahandeh N, Johar N. Effect of different cusp coverage patterns on fracture resistance of maxillary premolar teeth in mod composite restorations. J Islamic Dental Association of IRAN. 2014;26(1):2614.

Google Scholar 

Scotti N, Scansetti M, Rota R, et al. The effect of the post length and cusp coverage on the cycling and static load of endodontically treated maxillary premolars. Clin Oral Investig. 2014;15(6):923–9.

Article  Google Scholar 

Alassar R, Samy A, Amin R. Effect of Cavity Design and Cusp Inclination on Fracture Resistance of Indirect Overlay Restorations in Maxillary First Premolars: An In Vitro Study. Assiut Dent J. 2022;1(4):7–18.

Google Scholar 

Jiang MS, Bo MS, YongChun MS. Stress distribution in molars restored with inlays or onlays with or without endodontic treatment: A three-dimensional finite element analysis. J Prosthet Dent. 2010;10(1):1016.

Google Scholar 

Abbas A, Abdulameer Z. Effect of Different Restoration Designs on Fracture Strength of Endodontically Treated Teeth Weakened with MOD Cavities. J Res Med Dent Sci. 2004;9(7):190–6.

Google Scholar 

Abduo J, Sambrook RJ. Longevity of ceramic onlays: A systematic review. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2018;30(3):193–215.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Veneziani M. Posterior indirect adhesive restorations: updated indications and the morphology driven preparation technique. Int J Esthet Dent. 2017;12(2):204–30.

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Krifka S, Anthofer T, Fritzsch M, et al. Ceramic inlays and partial ceramic crowns: influence of remaining cusp wall thickness on the marginal integrity and enamel crack formation in vitro. Oper Dent. 2009;34(1):32–42.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Soares CJ, Soares PV, de Freitas Santos-Filho PC, et al. The influence of cavity design and glass fiber post on biomechanical behavior of endodontically treated premo-lars. J Endod. 2008;34(8):1015–9.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Chun-Li L, Yen-Hsiang C, Perng-Ru L. Multi factorial analysis of a cusp-replacing adhesive premolar restoration A Finite element study. J Dent. 2008;36:194–203.

Article  Google Scholar 

Cubas GB, Habekost L, Camacho GB, et al. Fracture resistance of premolars restored with inlay and onlay ceramic restorations and luted with two different agents. J Prosthodont Res. 2011;55(1):53–9.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Belli R, Geinzer E, Muschweck A, et al. Mechanical fatigue degradation of ceramics versus resin composites for dental restorations. DentMater. 2014;30(4):424–32.

CAS  Google Scholar 

Comments (0)

No login
gif