GBD 2017 DALYs and HALE Collaborators. Global, regional, and national disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs) for 359 diseases and injuries and healthy life expectancy (HALE) for 195 countries and territories, 1990–2017: a systematic analysis for the global burden of disease study 2017. Lancet. 2018;392(10159):1859–922. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32335-3.

Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

The WCOTROCHADIC. Report on Cardiovascular Health and Diseases in China 2022: an Updated Summary. Biomed Environ Sci. 2023;36(8):669–701. https://doi.org/10.3967/bes2023.106

Wang H, Zhang H, Zou Z. Changing profiles of cardiovascular disease and risk factors in China: a secondary analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019. Chin Med J Engl. 2023;136(20):2431–41. https://doi.org/10.1097/CM9.0000000000002741.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Jackson AC, Rogerson MC, Murphy BM. An integrated perspective for understanding the psychosocial impact of acute cardiovascular events: a scoping review. Heart Mind. 2023;7(3):137. https://doi.org/10.4103/hm.HM-D-23-00029.

Article  Google Scholar 

Anderson JL, Morrow DA. Acute myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med. 2017;376(21):2053–64. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMra1606915.

Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Park DW, Clare RM, Schulte PJ, et al. Extent, location, and clinical significance of non–infarct-related coronary artery disease among patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction. JAMA. 2014;312(19):2019–27. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2014.15095.

Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Percutaneous coronary revascularization strategies after myocardial infarction. a systematic review and network meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2024;84(3):276–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2024.04.051.

Article  Google Scholar 

Complete percutaneous coronary revascularization in acute coronary syndromes with multivessel coronary disease: a systematic review. JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions. 2023;16(19):2347–2364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2023.07.043

Singh S, Tantry US, Bliden K, et al. Meta-analysis of physiology-guided complete or culprit lesion-only percutaneous coronary interventions in myocardial infarction. Am J Cardiol. Published online September 17, 2024:S0002–9149(24)00691-X. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2024.09.013

Dobrić M, Furtula M, Tešić M, et al. Current status and future perspectives of fractional flow reserve derived from invasive coronary angiography. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023;10: 1181803. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2023.1181803.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Koo BK, Lee JM, Hwang D, et al. Practical application of coronary physiologic assessment. JACC Asia. 2023;3(5):689–706. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacasi.2023.07.003.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Lee JM, Kim HK, Park KH, et al. Fractional flow reserve versus angiography-guided strategy in acute myocardial infarction with multivessel disease: a randomized trial. Eur Heart J. 2023;44(6):473–84. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehac763.

Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Jiang J, Tang L, Du C, et al. Diagnostic performance of AccuFFRangio in the functional assessment of coronary stenosis compared with pressure wire-derived fractional flow reserve. Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2022;12(2):94958–94958. https://doi.org/10.21037/qims-21-463.

Article  Google Scholar 

Vrints C, Andreotti F, Koskinas KC, et al. 2024 ESC Guidelines for the management of chronic coronary syndromes: developed by the task force for the management of chronic coronary syndromes of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Endorsed by the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2024;45(36):3415–537. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehae177.

Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Dai N, Che W, Liu L, et al. Diagnostic value of angiography-derived IMR for coronary microcirculation and its prognostic implication after PCI. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2021. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcvm.2021.735743.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Li C, Hu Y, Wang J, et al. Are baseline conditions of coronary arteries sufficient for calculating angio-based index of microcirculatory resistance and fractional flow reserve? Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2023;13(9):6215–27. https://doi.org/10.21037/qims-23-72.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Witberg G, Bental T, Levi A, et al. Clinical outcomes of FFRangio-guided treatment for coronary artery disease. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2022;15(4):468–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2021.11.039.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Erriquez A, Campo G, Guiducci V, et al. QFR for the revascularization of nonculprit vessels in MI patients: insights from the FIRE Trial. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2024;17(12):1425–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2024.04.022.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Choi KH, Dai N, Li Y, et al. Functional coronary angiography-derived index of microcirculatory resistance in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2021;14(15):1670–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2021.05.027.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Song L, Xu B, Tu S, et al. 2-year outcomes of angiographic quantitative flow ratio-guided coronary interventions. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022;80(22):2089–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacc.2022.09.007.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Choi KH, Lee JM, Kim HK, et al. Fractional flow reserve and instantaneous wave-free ratio for nonculprit stenosis in patients with acute myocardial infarction. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2018;11(18):1848–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2018.06.045.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Jiang J, Hu Y, Li C, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of computational fluid dynamics-based fractional flow reserve derived from coronary angiography: the ACCURATE study. J Am Heart Assoc. 2025;0(0): e035672. https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.124.035672.

Article  Google Scholar 

Jiang J, Li C, Hu Y, et al. A novel CFD-based computed index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR) derived from coronary angiography to assess coronary microcirculation. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2022;221: 106897. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmpb.2022.106897.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Zhang Y, Pu J, Niu T, et al. Prognostic value of coronary angiography–derived index of microcirculatory resistance in non–ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction patients. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2024;17(16):1874–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2024.04.048.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Cutlip DE, Windecker S, Mehran R, et al. Clinical end points in coronary stent trials. Circulation. 2007;115(17):2344–51. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.685313.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Zhang J, Hu X, Jiang J, et al. Rationale and design of a comparison of angiography-derived fractional flow reserve-guided and intravascular ultrasound-guided intervention strategy for clinical outcomes in patients with coronary artery disease: a randomised controlled trial (FLAVOUR II). BMJ Open. 2023;13(12): e074349. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2023-074349.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Pijls NHJ, de Bruyne B, Peels K, et al. Measurement of fractional flow reserve to assess the functional severity of coronary-artery stenoses. N Engl J Med. 1996;334(26):1703–8. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199606273342604.

Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Neumann FJ, Sousa-Uva M, Ahlsson A, et al. 2018 ESC/EACTS guidelines on myocardial revascularization. Eur Heart J. 2019;40(2):87–165. https://doi.org/10.1093/eurheartj/ehy394.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Lawton JS, Tamis-Holland JE, Bangalore S, et al. 2021 ACC/AHA/SCAI guideline for coronary artery revascularization: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation. Published online January 18, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIR.0000000000001038

Andersen BK, Sejr-Hansen M, Westra J, et al. Quantitative flow ratio versus fractional flow reserve for guiding percutaneous coronary intervention: design and rationale of the randomised FAVOR III Europe Japan trial. EuroIntervention. 2023;18(16):e1358–64. https://doi.org/10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00214.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Angiographic quantitative flow ratio-guided coronary intervention (FAVOR III China): a multicentre, randomised, sham-controlled trial. The Lancet. 2021;398(10317):2149–2159. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(21)02248-0

Chang CC, Chuang MJ, Lee YH, et al. Vessel fractional flow reserve in assessment of non-culprit lesions in ST elevation myocardial infarction. Open Heart. 2021;8(2): e001691. https://doi.org/10.1136/openhrt-2021-001691.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Jo YS, Moon H, Park K. Different microcirculation response between culprit and non-culprit vessels in patients with acute coronary syndrome. J Am Heart Assoc. 2020. https://doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.119.015507.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar