Fatumo, S. et al. A roadmap to increase diversity in genomic studies. Nat. Med. 28, 243–250 (2022). This paper reports the persistent lack of diversity across genetic ancestry for participants in genome-wide association studies and discusses strategies to enhance inclusion.

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Popejoy, A. B. & Fullerton, S. M. Genomics is failing on diversity. Nature 538, 161–164 (2016).

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Need, A. C. & Goldstein, D. B. Next generation disparities in human genomics: concerns and remedies. Trends Genet. 25, 489–494 (2009).

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Bustamante, C. D., De La Vega, F. M. & Burchard, E. G. Genomics for the world. Nature 475, 163–165 (2011).

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Carrot-Zhang, J. et al. Comprehensive analysis of genetic ancestry and its molecular correlates in cancer. Cancer Cell 37, 639–654.e6 (2020).

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Bentley, A. R., Callier, S. & Rotimi, C. N. Diversity and inclusion in genomic research: why the uneven progress? J. Community Genet. 8, 255–266 (2017).

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Atutornu, J., Milne, R., Costa, A., Patch, C. & Middleton, A. Towards equitable and trustworthy genomics research. eBioMedicine 76, 103879 (2022).

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

World Health Organization. A Conceptual Framework for Action on the Social Determinants of Health (WHO, 2010).

Martin, A. R. et al. Human demographic history impacts genetic risk prediction across diverse populations. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 100, 635–649 (2017).

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Duncan, L. et al. Analysis of polygenic risk score usage and performance in diverse human populations. Nat. Commun. 10, 3328 (2019).

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Ding, Y. et al. Polygenic scoring accuracy varies across the genetic ancestry continuum. Nature 618, 774–781 (2023). This paper shows that the predictive accuracy of polygenic scores declines gradually across the continuum of genetic ancestry.

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Polygenic Risk Score Task Force of the International Common Disease Alliance. Responsible use of polygenic risk scores in the clinic: potential benefits, risks and gaps. Nat. Med. 27, 1876–1884 (2021).

Kullo, I. et al. Polygenic scores in biomedical research. Nat. Rev. Genet. 23, 524–532 (2022).

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Martin, A. R. et al. Clinical use of current polygenic risk scores may exacerbate health disparities. Nat. Genet. 51, 584–591 (2019). This paper explores the potential clinical implications of the limited generalizability of polygenic scores across populations.

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

The All of Us Research Program Investigators. The “All of Us” research program. N. Engl. J. Med. 381, 668–676 (2019).

The H3Africa Consortium et al. Enabling the genomic revolution in Africa. Science 344, 1346–1348 (2014).

Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Manrai, A. K. et al. Genetic misdiagnoses and the potential for health disparities. N. Engl. J. Med. 375, 655–665 (2016). This study shows that several genetic variants previously thought to cause hypertrophic cardiomyopathy were misclassified due to limited ancestral diversity in reference datasets, highlighting the need for more inclusive genomic data.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Manolio, T. A. Using the data we have: improving diversity in genomic research. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 105, 233–236 (2019).

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Bycroft, C. et al. The UK Biobank resource with deep phenotyping and genomic data. Nature 562, 203–209 (2018).

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Fry, A. et al. Comparison of sociodemographic and health-related characteristics of UK Biobank participants with those of the general population. Am. J. Epidemiol. 186, 1026–1034 (2017).

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Schoeler, T. et al. Participation bias in the UK Biobank distorts genetic associations and downstream analyses. Nat. Hum. Behav. 7, 1216–1227 (2023).

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Wang, Y., Tsuo, K., Kanai, M., Neale, B. & Martin, A. Challenges and opportunities for developing more generalizable polygenic risk scores. Annu. Rev. Biomed. Data Sci. 5, 293–320 (2022).

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Peterson, R. E. et al. Genome-wide association studies in ancestrally diverse populations: opportunities, methods, pitfalls, and recommendations. Cell 179, 589–603 (2019). This paper provides methodological guidance to support the analysis of genome-wide association studies in populations of diverse genetic ancestry.

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Kachuri, L. et al. Principles and methods for transferring polygenic risk scores across global populations. Nat. Rev. Genet. 25, 8–25 (2024). This review describes the factors limiting the generalizability of polygenic scores across populations and explores the merits of currently available methods to improve generalizability.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Chen, I. Y. et al. Ethical machine learning in healthcare. Annu. Rev. Biomed. Data Sci. 4, 123–144 (2021). This paper presents challenges and recommendations for developing equitable machine learning systems in healthcare across the entire development pipeline — from problem selection to deployment.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Burr, C. & Leslie, D. Ethical assurance: a practical approach to the responsible design, development, and deployment of data-driven technologies. AI Ethics 3, 73–98 (2023).

Article  Google Scholar 

Martin, A. R. et al. Increasing diversity in genomics requires investment in equitable partnerships and capacity building. Nat. Genet. 54, 740–745 (2022).

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Sirugo, G., Williams, S. M. & Tishkoff, S. A. The missing diversity in human genetic studies. Cell 177, 26–31 (2019).

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Purcell, S., Cherny, S. S. & Sham, P. C. Genetic power calculator: design of linkage and association genetic mapping studies of complex traits. Bioinformatics 19, 149–150 (2003).

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Wang, G. T., Li, B., Lyn Santos-Cortez, R. P., Peng, B. & Leal, S. M. Power analysis and sample size estimation for sequence-based association studies. Bioinformatics 30, 2377–2378 (2014).

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. Using population descriptors in genetics and genomics research: a new framework for an evolving field. https://doi.org/10.17226/26902 (National Academies Press, 2023). This National Academies report explores how population descriptors are currently used in genomics research, outlining best practices for researchers within the biomedical and scientific communities.

Dickman, S. L., Himmelstein, D. U. & Woolhandler, S. Inequality and the health-care system in the USA. Lancet 389, 1431–1441 (2017).

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Richmond, J., Anderson, A., Cunningham-Erves, J., Ozawa, S. & Wilkins, C. H. Conceptualizing and measuring trust, mistrust, and distrust: implications for advancing health equity and building trustworthiness. Annu. Rev. Public. Health 45, 465–484 (2024).

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central