Zisman AL. Effectiveness of Treatment Modalities on Kidney Stone Recurrence. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2017;12(10):1699–708. https://doi.org/10.2215/CJN.11201016. (Epub 20170822. PubMed PMID: 28830863; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC5628726).

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Sorokin I, Mamoulakis C, Miyazawa K, Rodgers A, Talati J, Lotan Y. Epidemiology of stone disease across the world. World J Urol. 2017;35(9):1301–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-017-2008-6. (Epub 20170217. PubMed PMID: 28213860).

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Khan SR, Pearle MS, Robertson WG, Gambaro G, Canales BK, Doizi S, et al. Kidney stones. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2016;2:16008. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrdp.2016.8. (Epub 20160225. PubMed PMID: 27188687; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC5685519).

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Gupta S, Shamsher S. Kidney stones: mechanism of formation, pathogenesis and possible treatments. J Biomol Biochem. 2018;2(1):1–5.

CAS  Google Scholar 

Srisubat A, Potisat S, Lojanapiwat B, Setthawong V, Laopaiboon M. Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) or retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for kidney stones. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;11:CD007044. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD007044.pub3. (Epub 20141124. PubMed PMID: 25418417).

Article  Google Scholar 

Chen Y, Li C, Gao L, Lin L, Zheng L, Ke L, et al. Novel flexible vacuum-assisted ureteral access sheath can actively control intrarenal pressure and obtain a complete stone-free status. J Endourol. 2022;36(9):1143–8. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2022.0004. (Epub 20220325. PubMed PMID: 35243899).

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Rodriguez D, Sacco DE. Minimally invasive surgical treatment for kidney stone disease. Adv Chronic Kidney Dis. 2015;22(4):266–72. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.ackd.2015.03.005. (PubMed PMID: 26088070).

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kaplan AG, Lipkin ME, Scales CD Jr, Preminger GM. Use of ureteral access sheaths in ureteroscopy. Nat Rev Urol. 2016;13(3):135–40. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrurol.2015.271. (Epub 20151124. PubMed PMID: 26597613).

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Al-Qahtani SM, Letendre J, Thomas A, Natalin R, Saussez T, Traxer O. Which ureteral access sheath is compatible with your flexible ureteroscope? J Endourol. 2014;28(3):286–90. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2013.0375. (Epub 20131227. PubMed PMID: 24147776).

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Inoue T, Okada S, Hamamoto S, Fujisawa M. Retrograde intrarenal surgery: past, present, and future. Investig Clin Urol. 2021;62(2):121–35. https://doi.org/10.4111/icu.20200526. (PubMedPMID:33660439;PubMedCentralPMCID:PMCPMC7940851).

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Yuan Y, Zhong R, Lai H, Huang Z, Zeng Y, Wu S, et al. The effectiveness and safety of sun tip-flexible ureterorenoscope for the management of kidney stones: a protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Medicine (Baltimore). 2021;100(1):e23964. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000023964. (PubMedPMID:33429757;PubMedCentralPMCID:PMCPMC7793437).

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Bai J, Shangguan T, Zou G, Liu L, Xue X, Lin J, et al. Efficacy and intrarenal pressure analysis of flexible and navigable suction ureteral access sheaths with flexible ureteroscopy in modified surgical positions for 2–6 cm upper urinary tract stones: a multicenter retrospective study. Front Med (Lausanne). 2024;11:1501464. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2024.1501464. (Epub 20241120. PubMed PMID: 39635581; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC11614632).

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Chen W, Lu K, Liu C, Weng J, Gao R. A feasibility study on the efficacy and safety of a novel tip-flexible suction ureteral access sheath combined with flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy for treating kidney stones ≥30 mm. J Endourol. 2025;39(2):135–45. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2024.0283. (Epub 20241126. PubMed PMID: 39601039).

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Hoffmann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. Updating guidance for reporting systematic reviews: development of the PRISMA 2020 statement. J Clin Epidemiol. 2021;134:103–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.02.003. (Epub 20210209. PubMed PMID: 33577987).

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Schlaeppi JM, Eppenberger U, Martiny-Baron G, Küng W. Chemiluminescence immunoassay for vascular endothelial growth factor (vascular permeability factor) in tumor-tissue homogenates. Clin Chem. 1996;42(11):1777–84.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Jüni P, Loke Y, Pigott T, Ramsay C, Regidor D, Rothstein H, et al. Risk of bias in non-randomized studies of interventions (ROBINS-I): detailed guidance. Br Med J. 2016;355: i4919.

Google Scholar 

Begg CB, Berlin JA. Publication bias and dissemination of clinical research. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1989;81(2):107–15. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnci/81.2.107. (PubMed PMID: 2642556).

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Huang J, Yang Y, Xie H, Fu Z, Zhu F, Xie L, et al. Vacuum-assisted dedusting lithotripsy in the treatment of kidney and proximal ureteral stones less than 3 cm in size. World J Urol. 2023;41(11):3097–103. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-023-04595-6. (Epub 20230912. PubMed PMID: 37698634).

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Chen H, Xiao J, Ge J, Liu T. Clinical efficacy analysis of tip-flexible suctioning ureteral access sheath combined with disposable flexible ureteroscope to treat 2–4 cm renal stones. Int Urol Nephrol. 2024;56(10):3193–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-024-04072-y. (Epub 20240508. PubMed PMID: 38717576; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC11405463).

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Cui D, Ma Q, Xie S, Wang G, Li G, Chen G. Comparison of the effectiveness of two adjustable negative pressure ureteral access sheaths combined with flex ureteroscopy for ≤ 2 cm renal stones. Sci Rep. 2024;14(1):4745. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-55333-w. (Epub 20240227. PubMed PMID: 38413652; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC10899199).

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Ding J, Su T, Zhang X, Qian S, Duan L, Huang Y, et al. Omnidirectional (Flexible) ureteral access sheath: safety, efficacy, and initial experience report. J Endourol. 2023;37(11):1184–90. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2023.0358. (PubMed PMID: 37725564).

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ong CSH, Somani BK, Chew BH, Fong KY, Bin Hamri S, Sridharan V, et al. Multicentre study comparing outcomes of RIRS using traditional suction ureteral access sheath (SUAS) and flexible and navigable suction UAS (FANS). J Clin Urology. 0(0):20514158241272717. https://doi.org/10.1177/20514158241272717.

Yu Y, Chen Y, Zhou X, Li X, Liu W, Cheng X, et al. Comparison of novel flexible and traditional ureteral access sheath in retrograde intrarenal surgery. World J Urol. 2024;42(1):7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-023-04697-1. (Epub 20240104. PubMed PMID: 38175210; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC10766707).

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Zhang Z, Xie T, Li F, Wang X, Liu F, Jiang B, et al. Comparison of traditional and novel tip-flexible suctioning ureteral access sheath combined with flexible ureteroscope to treat unilateral renal calculi. World J Urol. 2023;41(12):3619–27. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-023-04648-w. (Epub 20231011. PubMed PMID: 37821778; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC10693513).

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Zhu W, Liu S, Cao J, Wang H, Liang H, Jiang K, et al. Tip bendable suction ureteral access sheath versus traditional sheath in retrograde intrarenal stone surgery: an international multicentre, randomized, parallel group, superiority study. EClinicalMedicine. 2024;74:102724. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102724. (Epub 20240705. PubMed PMID: 39070176; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC11277316).

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Chen W, Lu K, Liu C, Weng J, Gao R. A feasibility study on the efficacy and safety of a novel tip-flexible suction ureteral access sheath combined with flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy for treating kidney stones >/=30 mm. J Endourol. 2024. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2024.0283. Epub 20241126. PubMed PMID: 39601039.

Ying Z, Dong H, Li C, Zhang S, Chen Y, Chen M, et al. Efficacy analysis of tip-flexible suction access sheath during flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy for unilateral upper urinary tract calculi. World J Urol. 2024;42(1):626. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-024-05325-2. (Epub 20241105. PubMed PMID: 39499350).

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Gauhar V, Madarriaga YQ, Somani B, Joshi R, Tanidir Y, Castellani D, et al. Is flexible and navigable suction ureteral access sheath (FANS-UAS) the next best development for retrograde intrarenal surgery in children? Results of a prospective multicentre study. World J Urol. 2024;42(1):627. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-024-05337-y. (Epub 20241106. PubMed PMID: 39503864).

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Peng G, Kuang J, Chen Y, Huang X, Song L, Deng X. Flexible ureteroscopy with a tip-flexible pressure-controlling ureteral access sheath for renal stones in children. Urol Int. 2024;108(5):429–33. https://doi.org/10.1159/000539311. (Epub 20240516. PubMed PMID: 38754402).

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Liang H, Liang L, Lin Y, Yu Y, Xu X, Liang Z, et al. Application of tip-bendable ureteral access sheath in flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy: an initial experience of 224 cases. BMC Urol. 2023;23(1):175. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12894-023-01347-x. (Epub 20231101. PubMed PMID: 37915008; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC10621309).

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Huang X, Song L, Deng X, Chen H, Xiao J, Kuang J, et al. Comparative efficacy and safety of intelligent pressure-controlled versus flexible vacuum-assisted ureteral access sheath for 2–4 cm renal calculi. Minerva Urol Nephrol. 2024.