Impact of Increasing Robotic Bariatric Utilization on Duodenal Switch Procedure Outcomes

Prachand VN, Davee RT, Alverdy JC. Duodenal switch provides superior weight loss in the super-obese (BMI > or =50 kg/m2) compared with gastric bypass. Ann Surg. 2006;244(4):611–9.

PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Skogar ML, Sundbom M. Duodenal switch is superior to gastric bypass in patients with super obesity when evaluated with the Bariatric Analysis and Reporting Outcome System (BAROS). Obes Surg. 2017;27(9):2308–16.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Risstad H, Søvik TT, Engström M, et al. Five-year outcomes after laparoscopic gastric bypass and laparoscopic duodenal switch in patients with body mass index of 50 to 60: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Surg. 2015;150(4):352–61.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Strain GW, Torghabeh MH, Gagner M, et al. The impact of biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch (BPD/DS) over 9 years. Obes Surg. 2017;27(3):787–94.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Topart P, Becouarn G, Delarue J. Weight loss and nutritional outcomes 10 years after biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch. Obes Surg. 2017;27(7):1645–50.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Strain GW, Torghabeh MH, Gagner M, et al. Nutrient status 9 years after biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch (BPD/DS): an observational study. Obes Surg. 2017;27(7):1709–18.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

English WJ, DeMaria EJ, Brethauer SA, et al. American Society for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery estimation of metabolic and bariatric procedures performed in the United States in 2016. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2018;14(3):259–63.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Aeschbacher P, Garoufalia Z, Rogers P, et al. Laparoscopic versus robotic-assisted primary bariatric-metabolic surgery. Are we still expecting to overcome the learning curve? A propensity score–matched analysis of the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program database. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2024;20(9):831–9.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Al-Mazrou AM, Bellorin O, Dhar V, et al. Minimally invasive versus open duodenal switch: a nationwide retrospective analysis. Surg Endosc. 2022;36(9):7000–7.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Al-Mazrou AM, Cruz MV, Dakin G, et al. Robotic duodenal switch is associated with outcomes comparable to those of laparoscopic approach. Obes Surg. 2021;31(5):2019–29.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Cashman CL, Shah SV, Hall AG, et al. Robotic-assisted and laparoscopic bariatric surgeries still have clinically comparable outcomes. Obes Surg. 2024;34(8):2954–64.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Seidelman JL, Mantyh CR, Anderson DJ. Surgical site infection prevention: a review. JAMA. 2023;329(3):244.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Merkow RP, Ju MH, Chung JW, et al. Underlying reasons associated with hospital readmission following surgery in the United States. JAMA. 2015;313(5):483.

Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Berenson RA, Paulus RA, Kalman NS. Medicare’s readmissions-reduction program — a positive alternative. N Engl J Med. 2012;366(15):1364–6.

Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Wang A, Wang H, Abdurakhmanov A, et al. Safety of primary versus revisional biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch in patients with super obesity using the MBSAQIP database. Obes Surg. 2022;32(5):1459–65.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Taylor J, Canner J, Cronauer C, et al. Implementation of an enhanced recovery program for bariatric surgery. Surg Endosc. 2020;34(6):2675–81.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Lam J, Suzuki T, Bernstein D, et al. An ERAS protocol for bariatric surgery: is it safe to discharge on post-operative day 1? Surg Endosc. 2019;33(2):580–6.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Daigle CR, Brethauer SA, Tu C, et al. Which postoperative complications matter most after bariatric surgery? Prioritizing quality improvement efforts to improve national outcomes. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2018;14:652–7.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Al-Mazrou AM, Cruz MV, Dakin G, et al. Stratification of readmission after bariatric surgery by day of post-discharge presentation. Obes Surg. 2021;31(4):1496–504.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Argueta PP, Salazar M, Vargo JJ, et al. Thirty-day readmission after bariatric surgery: causes, effects on outcomes, and predictors. Dig Dis Sci. 2022;67(3):834–43.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Coker A, Sebastian R, Tatum J, et al. Do advances in technology translate to improved outcomes? Comparing robotic bariatric surgery outcomes over two-time intervals utilizing the MBSAQIP database. Surg Endosc. 2023;37(10):7970–9.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Antanavicius G, Katsichtis T, Alswealmeen W, et al. Three hundred four robotically assisted biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch operations with gradual robotic approach implementation: short-term outcomes, complication profile, and lessons learned. Obes Surg. 2020;30(10):3961–7.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Teixeira A, Jawad M, Ghanem M, et al. Robot-assisted duodenal switch with DaVinci Xi: surgical technique and analysis of a single-institution experience of 661 cases. J Robot Surg. 2023;17(3):923–31.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Moon RC, Kirkpatrick V, Gaskins L, et al. Safety and effectiveness of single- versus double-anastomosis duodenal switch at a single institution. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2019;15(2):245–52.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Pennestrì F, Sessa L, Prioli F, et al. Robotic vs laparoscopic approach for single anastomosis duodenal-ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy: a propensity score matching analysis. Update Surg. 2023;75(1):175–87.

Article  Google Scholar 

Koeller E, Luhrs AR, Giorgi M. Changes in utilization of robotic bariatric surgery and effect on patient outcomes from 2015–2020. J Robot Surg. 2023;17(5):2041–5.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Bauerle WB, Mody P, Estep A, et al. Current trends in the utilization of a robotic approach in the field of bariatric surgery. Obes Surg. 2023;33(2):482–91.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ho K, Hsu CH, Maegawa F, et al. Operative time and 30-day outcomes in bariatric surgery: comparison between robotic and laparoscopic approach: 4-year MBSAQIP database analysis. J Am Coll Surg. 2022;235(1):138–44.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Cohen ME, Bilimoria KY, Ko CY, et al. Variability in length of stay after colorectal surgery: assessment of 182 hospitals in the national surgical quality improvement program. Ann Surg. 2009;250(6):901–7.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Romano P, Hussey P, Ritley D. Selecting quality and resource use measures: a decision guide for community quality collaboratives [Internet]. Vol. 9. Citeseer; 2010 [cited 2024 Aug 14]. Available from: https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/document?repid=rep1&type=pdf&doi=e78d6e44db11a92f3be86033c8f58844f81b0209.

Dapri G, Cadière GB, Himpens J. Laparoscopic conversion of adjustable gastric banding and vertical banded gastroplasty to duodenal switch. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2009;5(6):678–83.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ren CJ, Patterson E, Gagner M. Early results of laparoscopic biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch: a case series of 40 consecutive patients. Obes Surg. 2000;10(6):514–23; discussion 524.

Edholm D, Axer S, Hedberg J, et al. Laparoscopy in duodenal switch: safe and halves length of stay in a nationwide cohort from the Scandinavian Obesity Registry. Scand J Surg. 2017;106(3):230–4.

Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Sudan R, Podolsky E. Totally robot-assisted biliary pancreatic diversion with duodenal switch: single dock technique and technical outcomes. Surg Endosc. 2015;29(1):55–60.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Sudan R, Puri V, Sudan D. Robotically assisted biliary pancreatic diversion with a duodenal switch: a new technique. Surg Endosc. 2007;21(5):729–33.

Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Teixeira A, Jawad M, Ghanem M, et al. Analysis of the impact of the learning curve on the safety outcome of the totally robotic-assisted biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch: a single-institution observational study. Obes Surg. 2023;33(9):2742–8.

Article  PubMed 

Comments (0)

No login
gif