Rocco, B. et al. Insights from telesurgery expert conference on recent clinical experience and current status of remote surgery. J. Robot. Surg. 18, 240 (2024).
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Moschovas, M. C., Dohler, M. & Patel, V. Telesurgery: challenges, ethical considerations, and opportunities in the robotic surgery era. Eur. Urol. Focus https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euf.2025.02.016 (2025).
Patel, V. et al. International multispecialty consensus statement and expert opinion of best practices in telesurgery. J. Robot. Surg. 19, 135 (2025).
Patel, V. et al. Technical and ethical considerations in telesurgery. J. Robot. Surg. 18, 40 (2024).
Ferreira, S. V. et al. Feasibility and initial outcomes of telesurgery in urology: a systematic review of the literature. Int. Braz. J. Urol. 51, e20240494 (2025).
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Wang, Y. et al. Safety and reliability of a robot-assisted laparoscopic telesurgery system: expanding indications in urological surgery. Eur. Urol. 85, 506–507 (2024).
Rubio-Briones, J. & Gallioli, A. The key to humanitarian urology: do not import the surgeon, create trained local surgical teams. Nat. Rev. Urol. 22, 188–189 (2025).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Challacombe, B., Kavoussi, L., Patriciu, A., Stoianovici, D. & Dasgupta, P. Technology insight: telementoring and telesurgery in urology. Nat. Clin. Pract. Urol. 3, 611–617 (2006).
Collins, J. W. et al. Ethical implications of AI in robotic surgical training: a Delphi consensus statement. Eur. Urol. Focus 8, 613–622 (2022).
Basile, G. et al. Current standards for training in robot-assisted surgery and endourology: a systematic review. Eur. Urol. 86, 130–145 (2024).
Comments (0)