Dexter F. Regional anesthesia does not significantly change surgical time versus general anesthesia—a meta-analysis of randomized studies. Reg Anesth Pain Med 1998; 23: 439–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/s1098-7339(98)90024-4

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Strum DP, May JH, Vargas LG. Modeling the uncertainty of surgical procedure times: comparison of the log-normal and normal models. Anesthesiology 2000; 92: 1160–67. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000542-200004000-00035

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Titler S, Dexter F, Epstein RH. Percentages of cases in operating rooms of sufficient duration to accommodate a 30-minute breast milk pumping session by anesthesia residents or nurse anesthetists. Cureus 2021; 13: e12519. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.12519

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Dexter F, Bayman EO, Epstein RH. Statistical modeling of average and variability of time to extubation for meta-analysis comparing desflurane to sevoflurane. Anesth Analg 2010; 110: 570–80. https://doi.org/10.1213/ane.0b013e3181b5dcb7

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Higgins JP, White IR, Anzures-Cabrera J. Meta-analysis of skewed data: combining results reported on log-transformed or raw scales. Stat Med 2008; 27: 6072–92. https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.3427

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Wachtel RE, Dexter F, Epstein RH, Ledolter J. Meta-analysis of desflurane and propofol average times and variability in times to extubation and following commands. Can J Anesth 2011; 58: 714–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12630-011-9519-1

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Dexter F, Ledolter J. Exceedance probabilities of log-normal distributions for one group, two groups, and meta-analysis of multiple two-group studies, with application to analyses of prolonged times to tracheal extubation. J Med Syst 2023; 47: 49. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-023-01935-2

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ledolter J, Dexter F, Epstein RH. Analysis of variance of communication latencies in anesthesia: comparing means of multiple log-normal distributions. Anesth Analg 2011; 113: 888–96. https://doi.org/10.1213/ane.0b013e318227518f

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Microsoft. RAND function. Available from URL: https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/office/rand-function-4cbfa695-8869-4788-8d90-021ea9f5be73 (accessed June 2024).

Krishnamoorthy K, Mathew T, Ramachandran G. Generalized P-values and confidence intervals: a novel approach for analyzing lognormally distributed exposure data. J Occup Environ Hyg 2006; 3: 642–50. https://doi.org/10.1080/15459620600961196

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

DerSimonian R, Laird NM. Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials 1986; 7: 177–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/0197-2456(86)90046-2

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Veroniki AA, Jackson D, Viechtbauer W, et al. Methods to estimate the between-study variance and its uncertainty in meta-analysis. Res Synth Methods 2016; 7: 55–79. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1164

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Röver C, Knapp G, Friede T. Hartung–Knapp–Sidik–Jonkman approach and its modification for random-effects meta-analysis with few studies. BMC Med Res Methodol 2015; 15: 99. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12874-015-0091-1

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Langan D, Higgins JP, Jackson D, et al. A comparison of heterogeneity variance estimators in simulated random-effects meta-analyses. Res Syn Methods 2019; 10: 83–98. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1316

Article  Google Scholar 

Sánchez-Meca J, Marín-Martínez F. Confidence intervals for the overall effect size in random-effects meta-analysis. Psychol Methods 2008; 13: 31–48. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989x.13.1.31

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Alereza H, Banihashem N, Akhlaghi I, Amri P, Barat SH. The effect of general anesthesia and spinal anesthesia on quality of recovery after abdominal hysterectomy; randomised clinical trial. J Adv Med Biomed Res 2018; 26: 12–20.

Article  Google Scholar 

Amin OA, Salah HE. The effect of general or spinal anaesthesia on pro- and anti-inflammatory intracellular cytokines in patients undergoing appendicectomy using flowcytometric method. Egypt J Anaesth 2011; 27: 121–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egja.2011.04.005

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Aremu PA, Ajayi AM, Ben-Azu B, Orewole OT, Umukoro S. Spinal and general anesthesia produces differential effects on oxidative stress and inflammatory cytokines in orthopedic patients. Drug Metab Pers Ther 2020; https://doi.org/10.1515/dmdi-2020-0134

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Bakri MH, Ismail EA, Ghanem G, Shokry M. Spinal versus general anesthesia for Cesarean section in patients with sickle cell anemia. Korean J Anesthesiol 2015; 68: 469–75. https://doi.org/10.4097/kjae.2015.68.5.469

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Bessa SS, El-Sayes IA, El-Saiedi MK, Abdel-Baki NA, Abdel-Maksoud MM. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy under spinal versus general anesthesia: a prospective, randomized study. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 2010; 20: 515–20. https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2010.0041

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Bigler D, Adelhøj B, Petring OU, Pederson NO, Busch P, Kalhke P. Mental function and morbidity after acute hip surgery during spinal and general anaesthesia. Anaesthesia 1985; 40: 672–6. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2044.1985.tb10949.x

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Bredahl C, Hindsholm KB, Frandsen PC. Changes in body heat during hip fracture surgery: a comparison of spinal analgesia and general anaesthesia. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1991; 35: 548–52. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-6576.1991.tb03346.x

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Dahl JB, Schultz P, Anker-Møller E, Christensen EF, Staunstrup HG, Carlsson P. Spinal anaesthesia in young patients using a 29-gauge needle: technical considerations and an evaluation of postoperative complaints compared with general anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth 1990; 64: 178–82. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/64.2.178

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Dahl V, Gierløff C, Omland E, Raeder JC. Spinal, epidural or propofol anaesthesia for out-patient knee arthroscopy? Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1997; 41: 1341–5. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-6576.1997.tb04655.x

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Davis FM, McDermott E, Hickton C, et al. Influence of spinal and general anaesthesia on haemostasis during total hip arthroplasty. Br J Anaesth 1987; 59: 561–71. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/59.5.561

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Davis FM, Laurenson VG, Gillespie WJ, Foate J, Seagar AD. Leg blood flow during total hip replacement under spinal or general anaesthesia. Anaesth Intensive Care 1989; 17: 136–43. https://doi.org/10.1177/0310057x8901700203

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Davis FM, Laurenson VG, Gillespie WJ, Wells JE, Foate J, Newman E. Deep vein thrombosis after total hip replacement. a comparison between spinal and general anaesthesia. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1989; 71: 181–5. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.71b2.2925731

Dobson PM, Caldicott LD, Gerrish SP, Cole JR, Channer KS. Changes in haemodynamic variables during transurethral resection of the prostate: comparison of general and spinal anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth 1994; 72: 267–71. https://doi.org/10.1093/bja/72.3.267

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Donmez T, Erdem VM, Sunamak O, Erdem DA, Avaroglu HI. Laparoscopic total extraperitoneal repair under spinal anesthesia versus general anesthesia: a randomized prospective study. Ther Clin Risk Manag 2016; 12: 1599–608. https://doi.org/10.2147/tcrm.s117891

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Dyer RA, Els I, Farbas J, Torr GJ, Schoeman LK, James MF. Prospective, randomized trial comparing general with spinal anesthesia for Cesarean delivery in preeclamptic patients with a nonreassuring fetal heart trace. Anesthesiology 2003; 99: 561–9. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000542-200309000-00010

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Elakany MH, Abdelhamid SA. Segmental thoracic spinal has advantages over general anesthesia for breast cancer surgery. Anesth Essays Res 2013; 7: 390–5. https://doi.org/10.4103/0259-1162.123263