Garry R (2005) The future of hysterectomy. BJOG 112(2):133–139. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2004.00431.x

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Schorr O, Hata N, Bzostek A et al (2000) Distributed modular computer-integrated surgical robotic systems: architecture for intelligent object distribution. Lect Notes Comput Sci 1935:979–987

Article  Google Scholar 

O’Neill M, Moran PS, Teljeur C et al (2013) Robot-assisted hysterectomy compared to open and laparoscopic approaches: systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Gynecol Obstet 287(5):907–918. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-012-2681-z

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Orady M, Hrynewych A, Nawfal AK, Wegienka G (2012) Comparison of robotic-assisted hysterectomy to other minimally invasive approaches. JSLS 16(4):542–548. https://doi.org/10.4293/108680812X13462882736899

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Geppert B, Lönnerfors C, Persson J (2011) Robot-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy in obese and morbidly obese women: surgical technique and comparison with open surgery. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 90(11):1210–1217. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0412.2011.01253.x

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Zanagnolo V, Garbi A, Achilarre MT, Minig L (2017) Robot-assisted surgery in gynecologic cancers. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 24(3):379–396. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2017.01.006

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Bizzarri N, Querleu D, Ramirez PT et al (2025) Minimally invasive simple hysterectomy in low-risk cervical cancer: a single-arm trial with stopping rules (ENGOT-cx23/MITO/LASH trial). Int J Gynecol Cancer. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgc.2025.101818

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ito H, Yokoyama Y, Kyo S et al (2024) Interim analysis of robot-assisted radical hysterectomy in Japan: a multicenter, prospective interventional single-arm clinical trial. BMC Cancer 24(1):1360. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12885-024-13090-z

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Sickinghe A, Nobbenhuis M, Nelissen E, Heath O, Ind T (2024) Proficiency-based progression training in robot-assisted laparoscopy for endometrial cancer: peri-operative and survival outcomes from an observational cohort study. Front Med (Lausanne) 11:1370836. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2024.1370836

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Nagata H, Komatsu H, Yamamoto K, et al (2025) Comparison of hysterectomy using four different robotic surgical systems; a retrospective cohort study. Jpn J Clin Oncol. https://doi.org/10.1093/jjco/hyaf109

Bornmann L, Leydesdorff L (2014) Scientometrics in a changing research landscape: bibliometrics has become an integral part of research quality evaluation and has been changing the practice of research. EMBO Rep 15(12):1228–1232. https://doi.org/10.15252/embr.201439608

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Cannone F, Ladaique A, Lambaudie E, Collinet P, Houvenaeghel G (2011) Robot-assisted laparoscopy in gynecologic surgery. J Visc Surg 148(5):e30–e39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2011.04.006

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Sert BM, Boggess JF, Ahmad S et al (2016) Robot-assisted versus open radical hysterectomy: a multi-institutional experience for early-stage cervical cancer. Eur J Surg Oncol 42(4):513–522. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2015.12.014

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Davis JW, Kreaden US, Gabbert J, Thomas R (2014) Learning curve assessment of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy compared with open-surgery controls from the premier perspective database. J Endourol 28(5):560–566. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2013.0534

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Park DA, Yun JE, Kim SW, Lee SH (2017) Surgical and clinical safety and effectiveness of robot-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy compared to conventional laparoscopy and laparotomy for cervical cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Surg Oncol 43(6):994–1002. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2016.07.017

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Zusterzeel PLM, Aarts JWM, Pol FJM, Ottevanger PB, van Ham MAPC (2020) Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by vaginal radical trachelectomy as fertility-preserving treatment for patients with FIGO 2018 stage 1B2 cervical cancer. Oncologist 25(7):e1051–e1059. https://doi.org/10.1634/theoncologist.2020-0063

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Jung YW, Lee DW, Kim SW et al (2010) Robot-assisted staging using three robotic arms for endometrial cancer: comparison to laparoscopy and laparotomy at a single institution. J Surg Oncol 101(2):116–121. https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.21436

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Chen SH, Li ZA, Huang R, Xue HQ (2016) Robot-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for endometrial cancer staging: a meta-analysis. Taiwan J Obstet Gynecol 55(4):488–494. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tjog.2016.01.003

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kanno K, Higuchi N, Taniguchi R, Andou M (2025) Vaginal-assisted natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery hysterectomy for large uterus using the da Vinci SP. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 32(5):415–416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmig.2025.01.008

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Soto E, Luu TH, Liu X, et al (2017) Laparoscopy vs. Robotic Surgery for Endometriosis (LAROSE): a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial. Fertil Steril 107(4):996–1002.e3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.12.033

Olsen RG, Hartwell D, Dalsgaard T et al (2024) First experience with the Hugo™ robot-assisted surgery system for endometriosis: a descriptive study. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 103(2):368–377. https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.14727

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Haveman I, van Weelden WJ, Roovers EA, Kraayenbrink AA, Dijkhuizen FPHLJ (2022) Robot-assisted total laparoscopic hysterectomy in different classes of obesity: a cohort study. JSLS 26(1):e2021.00077. https://doi.org/10.4293/JSLS.2021.00077

Zaccarini F, Falconer H (2025) Advantages of robotic surgery in obese patients with endometrial cancer. Curr Opin Oncol 37(5):464–469. https://doi.org/10.1097/CCO.0000000000001156

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Nitecki R, Ramirez PT, Frumovitz M et al (2020) Survival after minimally invasive vs open radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Oncol 6(7):1019–1027. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2020.1694

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ramirez PT, Frumovitz M, Pareja R et al (2018) Minimally invasive versus abdominal radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer. N Engl J Med 379(20):1895–1904. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1806395

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Gao Z (2025) Deciphering the dualities of robotic hysterectomy in endometrial cancer: toward personalized approaches and AI-driven insights. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jogoh.2025.102966

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Youssef Y, Afaneh H, Borahay MA (2022) Strategies for cost optimization in minimally invasive gynecologic surgery. JSLS 26(3):e2022.00015. https://doi.org/10.4293/JSLS.2022.00015

Turchetti G, Palla I, Pierotti F, Cuschieri A (2012) Economic evaluation of da Vinci-assisted robotic surgery: a systematic review. Surg Endosc 26(3):598–606. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-011-1936-2

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kosa SD, Ferguson SE, Panzarella T et al (2022) A prospective comparison of costs between robotics, laparoscopy, and laparotomy in endometrial cancer among women with class III obesity or higher. J Surg Oncol 125(4):747–753. https://doi.org/10.1002/jso.26769

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Gulino G, Antonucci M, Palermo G et al (2012) La tecnologia robotica nel contesto urologico italiano: analisi economica costo-efficacia [Robot technology in the Italian Health-CARE system: cost-efficacy economic analysis]. Urologia 79(2):69–80. https://doi.org/10.5301/RU.2012.9098

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Specchia ML, Arcuri G, Di Pilla A, et al (2022) The value of surgical admissions for malignant uterine cancer. A comparative analysis of robotic, laparoscopic, and laparotomy surgery in a university hospital. Front Public Health. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2022.920578

Nahas S, Feigenberg T, Park S (2016) Feasibility and safety of same-day discharge after minimally invasive hysterectomy in gynecologic oncology: a systematic review of the literature. Gynecol Oncol 143(2):439–442. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2016.07.113

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Rajanbabu A, Patel V, Anandita A, Appukuttan A (2022) A prospective observational study assessing the feasibility and factors affecting same-day discharge in patients undergoing robotic-assisted surgery for gynecological cancers. J Robot Surg 16(5):1143–1149. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-021-01353-x

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Benoit L, Delangle R, Van NT et al (