Effectiveness and safety of different types of ablation modalities in patients with atrial fibrillation: a bayesian network meta-analysis from randomized controlled trials

Chugh SS, Havmoeller R, Narayanan K, Singh D, Rienstra M, Benjamin EJ, et al. Worldwide epidemiology of atrial fibrillation: a global burden of disease 2010 study. Circulation. 2014;129:837–47.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Dai H, Zhang Q, Much AA, Maor E, Segev A, Beinart R, et al. Global, regional, and National prevalence, incidence, mortality, and risk factors for atrial fibrillation, 1990–2017: results from the global burden of disease study 2017. Eur Heart J Qual Care Clin Outcomes. 2020;7:574–82.

Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Kirchhof P, Benussi S, Kotecha D, Ahlsson A, Atar D, Casadei B, et al. 2016 ESC guidelines for the management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with EACTS. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2016;50:e1–88.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Haïssaguerre M, Jaïs P, Shah DC, Takahashi A, Hocini M, Quiniou G, et al. Spontaneous initiation of atrial fibrillation by ectopic beats originating in the pulmonary veins. N Engl J Med. 1998;339:659–66.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Verma A, Jiang C, Betts TR, Chen J, Deisenhofer I, Mantovan R, et al. Approaches to catheter ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2015;372:1812–22.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Skelly A, Hashimoto R, Al-Khatib S, Sanders-Schmidler G, Fu R, Brodt E et al. Catheter Ablation for Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation [Internet]. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2015 [cited 2024 Aug 21]. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK305760/

Calkins H, Hindricks G, Cappato R, Kim Y-H, Saad EB, Aguinaga L, et al. 2017 HRS/EHRA/ECAS/APHRS/SOLAECE expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation: executive summary. Europace. 2018;20:157–208.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Yates T-A, McGilvray M, Schill MR, Barron L, Razo N, Roberts HG, et al. Performance of an irrigated bipolar radiofrequency ablation clamp on explanted human hearts. Ann Thorac Surg. 2023;116:307–13.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Phan K, Phan S, Thiagalingam A, Medi C, Yan TD. Thoracoscopic surgical ablation versus catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2016;49:1044–51.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Wolf RK. Surgical treatment of atrial fibrillation. Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J. 2021;17:56–64.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Hutton B, Salanti G, Caldwell DM, Chaimani A, Schmid CH, Cameron C, et al. The PRISMA extension statement for reporting of systematic reviews incorporating network meta-analyses of health care interventions: checklist and explanations. Ann Intern Med. 2015;162:777–84.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Methley AM, Campbell S, Chew-Graham C, McNally R, Cheraghi-Sohi S. PICO, PICOS and SPIDER: a comparison study of specificity and sensitivity in three search tools for qualitative systematic reviews. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014;14:579.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Sterne JAC, Savović J, Page MJ, Elbers RG, Blencowe NS, Boutron I, et al. RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials. BMJ. 2019;366:l4898.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

McGuinness LA, Higgins JPT. Risk-of-bias visualization (robvis): an R package and Shiny web app for visualizing risk-of-bias assessments. Res Synthesis Methods. 2021;12:55–61.

Article  Google Scholar 

van Valkenhoef G, Lu G, de Brock B, Hillege H, Ades AE, Welton NJ. Automating network meta-analysis. Res Synth Methods. 2012;3:285–99.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Owen RK, Bradbury N, Xin Y, Cooper N, Sutton A, MetaInsight. An interactive web-based tool for analyzing, interrogating, and visualizing network meta‐analyses using R‐shiny and Netmeta. Res Synth Methods. 2019;10:569–81.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Egger M, Smith GD, Schneider M, Minder C. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ. 1997;315:629–34.

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Viechtbauer W, Cheung MW-L. Outlier and influence diagnostics for meta-analysis. Res Synth Methods. 2010;1:112–25.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

van Valkenhoef G, Dias S, Ades AE, Welton NJ. Automated generation of node-splitting models for assessment of inconsistency in network meta-analysis. Res Synthesis Methods. 2016;7:80–93.

Article  Google Scholar 

LI Y, YU J, ZENG T. Deviance information criterion for bayesian model selection: justification and variation. Res Collect School Econ. 2017;1–40.

Sadeghirad B, Foroutan F, Zoratti MJ, Busse JW, Brignardello-Petersen R, Guyatt G, et al. Theory and practice of bayesian and frequentist frameworks for network meta-analysis. BMJ Evid Based Med. 2023;28:204–9.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Daly CH, Neupane B, Beyene J, Thabane L, Straus SE, Hamid JS. Empirical evaluation of SUCRA-based treatment ranks in network meta-analysis: quantifying robustness using Cohen’s kappa. BMJ Open. 2019;9:e024625.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Nikolakopoulou A, Higgins JPT, Papakonstantinou T, Chaimani A, Del Giovane C, Egger M, et al. CINeMA: an approach for assessing confidence in the results of a network meta-analysis. PLoS Med. 2020;17:e1003082.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Papakonstantinou T, Nikolakopoulou A, Higgins JPT, Egger M, Salanti G. CINeMA: software for semiautomated assessment of the confidence in the results of network meta-analysis. Campbell Syst Rev. 2020;16:e1080.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Salanti G, Del Giovane C, Chaimani A, Caldwell DM, Higgins JPT. Evaluating the quality of evidence from a network meta-analysis. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e99682.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Lin L, Chu H. Meta-analysis of proportions using generalized linear mixed models. Epidemiology. 2020;31:713–7.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Smith TC, Spiegelhalter DJ, Thomas A. Bayesian approaches to random-effects meta-analysis: a comparative study. Stat Med. 1995;14:2685–99.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Warn DE, Thompson SG, Spiegelhalter DJ. Bayesian random effects meta-analysis of trials with binary outcomes: methods for the absolute risk difference and relative risk scales. Stat Med. 2002;21:1601–23.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Koch L, Haeusler KG, Herm J, Safak E, Fischer R, Malzahn U, et al. Mesh ablator vs. cryoballoon pulmonary vein ablation of symptomatic paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: results of the MACPAF study. Europace. 2012;14:1441–9.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Chernyavskiy A, Kareva Y, Pak I, Rakhmonov S, Pokushalov E, Romanov A. Quality of life after surgical ablation of persistent atrial fibrillation: A prospective evaluation. Heart Lung Circ. 2016;25:378–83.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Buist TJ, Adiyaman A, Smit JJJ, Ramdat Misier AR, Elvan A. Arrhythmia-free survival and pulmonary vein reconnection patterns after second-generation cryoballoon and contact-force radiofrequency pulmonary vein isolation. Clin Res Cardiol. 2018;107:498–506.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Boersma LVA, Castella M, van Boven W, Berruezo A, Yilmaz A, Nadal M, et al. Atrial fibrillation catheter ablation versus surgical ablation treatment (FAST): a 2-center randomized clinical trial. Circulation. 2012;125:23–30.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Chieng D, Segan L, Sugumar H, Al-Kaisey A, Hawson J, Moore BM, et al. Higher power short duration vs. lower power longer duration posterior wall ablation for atrial fibrillation and oesophageal injury outcomes: a prospective multi-centre randomized controlled study (Hi-Lo HEAT trial). Europace. 2023;25:417–24.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Pokushalov E, Romanov A, Elesin D, Bogachev-Prokophiev A, Losik D, Bairamova S, et al. Catheter versus surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation after a failed initial pulmonary vein isolation procedure: a randomized controlled trial. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2013;24:1338–43.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Adiyaman A, Buist TJ, Beukema RJ, Smit JJJ, Delnoy PPHM, Hemels MEW, et al. Randomized controlled trial of surgical versus catheter ablation for paroxysmal and early persistent atrial fibrillation. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2018;11:e006182.

Article  PubMed 

Comments (0)

No login
gif