Feasibility of implementing a codesigned patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) collection system for older adults in acute and sub-acute hospital settings

Porter, M. (2009). A strategy for health care reform - toward a value-based system. New England Journal of Medicine, 361(2), 109–112.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Porter, M. (2010). What is value in health care? New England Journal of Medicine, 363(26), 2477–2481.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Porter, M., Larsson, S., & Lee, T. (2013). The strategy that will fix health care. Harvard Business Review, 91(10), 1–19.

Google Scholar 

World Health Organization (2015). World report on ageing and health. WHO. Retrieved June 17, 2024, from https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/186463

Black, N. (2013). Patient reported outcome measures could help transform healthcare. British Medical Journal, 346, f167. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.f167

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Williams, K., Sansoni, J., Darcy, M., Grootemaat, P., & Thompson, C. (2016). Patient reported outcome measures: Literature review. Australian commission on safety and quality in health care.

Gutacker, N., & Street, A. (2019). Calls for routine collection of patient-reported outcome measures are getting louder. Journal of Health Services Research and Policy, 24(1), 1–2. https://doi.org/10.1177/1355819618812239

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Newell, D., Diment, E., & Bolton, J. E. (2016). An electronic patient-reported outcome measures system in UK chiropractic practices: A feasibility study of routine collection of outcomes and costs. Journal of Manipulative and Physiological Therapeutics, 39(1), 31–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmpt.2015.12.001

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Peters, M., Crocker, H., Jenkinson, C., Doll, H., & Fitzpatrick, R. (2014). The routine collection of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) for long-term conditions in primary care: A cohort survey. British Medical Journal Open, 4(2), e003968.

Price, C. M., de Williams, C. A., Smith, B. H., & Bottle, A. (2019). Implementation of Patient-Reported outcomes (PROMs) from specialist pain clinics in England and Wales: Experience from a nationwide study. European Journal of Pain, 23(7), 1368–1377. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejp.1406

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Rutherford, C., Campbell, R., Tinsley, M., Speerin, R., Soars, L., Butcher, A., & King, M. (2021). Implementing patient-reported outcome measures into clinical practice across NSW: Mixed methods evaluation of the first year. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 16(3), 1265–1284. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11482-020-09817-2

Article  Google Scholar 

van der Willik, E. M., Hemmelder, M. H., Bart, H. A. J., van Ittersum, F. J., Hoogendijk-van den Akker, J. M., Bos, W. J. W., Dekker, F. W., & Meuleman, Y. (2021). Routinely measuring symptom burden and health-related quality of life in dialysis patients: First results from the Dutch registry of Patient-Reported outcome measures. Clinical Kidney Journal, 14(6), 1535–1544. https://doi.org/10.1093/ckj/sfz192

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

O’Connell, S., Palmer, R., Withers, K., Saha, N., Puntoni, S., & Carolan-Rees, G. (2018). Requirements for the collection of electronic PROMS either in clinic or at home as part of the proms, PREMs and effectiveness programme (PPEP) in Wales: A feasibility study using A generic PROM tool. Pilot and Feasibility Studies, 4,(1), 90. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40814-018-0282-8

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Foster, A., Croot, L., Brazier, J., Harris, J., & O’Cathain, A. (2018). The facilitators and barriers to implementing patient reported outcome measures in organisations delivering health related services: A systematic review of reviews. Journal of Patient Reported Outcomes, 2,(1), 46. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41687-018-0072-3

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Hettiarachchi Senarath, G. M., Haghighi, D., Bai, P., Shannon, L., Andrew, M. M., Srikanth, N. E., Snowdon, V., D. A., & O’Connor, D. A. (2024). Barriers and facilitators to the uptake of electronic collection and use of patient-reported measures in routine care of older adults: A systematic review with qualitative evidence synthesis. JAMIA Open, 7(3), ooae068. https://doi.org/10.1093/jamiaopen/ooae068

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Naude, K., Andrew, N. E., Srikanth, V., Parker, E., Marsh, L., Beare, R., McNaney, R., & Snowdon, D. A. (2024). Using a multi-stakeholder co-design process to develop a health service organisation-wide patient reported outcome measure collection system. Quality of Life Research, 33(3), 619–636. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-023-03552-5

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Andrew, N. E., Beare, R., Ravipati, T., Parker, E., Snowdon, D., Naude, K., & Srikanth, V. (2023). Developing a linked electronic health record derived data platform to support research into healthy ageing. International Journal of Population Data Science, 8(1), 2129. https://doi.org/10.23889/ijpds.v8i1.2129

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Schoonenboom, J., & Johnson, R. B. (2017). How to construct a mixed methods research design. Kölner Zeitschrift Für Soziologie Und Sozialpsychologie, 69(Suppl 2), 107–131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11577-017-0454-1

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Roydhouse, J. K., Cohen, M. L., Eshoj, H. R., Corsini, N., Yucel, E., Rutherford, C., Wac, K., Berrocal, A., Lanzi, A., Nowinski, C., Roberts, N., Kassianos, A. P., Sebille, V., King, M. T., Mercieca-Bebber, R., & ISOQOL Proxy Task Force and the ISOQOL Board of Directors. (2022). The use of proxies and proxy-reported measures: A report of the international society for quality of life research (ISOQOL) proxy task force. Quality of Life Research, 31(2), 317–327. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-021-02937-8

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Hussain, H., Keetharuth, A., Rowen, D., & Wailoo, A. (2022). Convergent validity of EQ-5D with core outcomes in dementia: A systematic review. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 20, 152. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-022-02062-1

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Bowen, D. J., Kreuter, M., Spring, B., Cofta-Woerpel, L., Linnan, L., Weiner, D., Bakken, S., Kaplan, C. P., Squiers, L., Fabrizio, C., & Fernandez, M. (2009). How we design feasibility studies. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 36(5), 452–457. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2009.02.002

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Snowdon, D. A., Srikanth, V., Beare, R., Marsh, L., Parker, E., Naude, K., & Andrew, N. E. (2023). A landscape assessment of the use of patient reported outcome measures in research, quality improvement and clinical care across a healthcare organisation. BMC Health Services Research, 23(1), 94. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-023-09050-1

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Snowdon, D. A., Srikanth, V., Beare, R., Noeske, K. E., Le, E., O’Bree, B., & Andrew, N. E. (2023). Acceptability of the routine use and collection of A generic patient reported outcome measure from the perspective of healthcare staff: A qualitative study. Journal of Patient Reported Outcomes, 7(1), 81. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41687-023-00617-4

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Snowdon, D. A., Collyer, T. A., Marsh, L., Srikanth, V., Beare, R., Baber, S., Naude, K., & Andrew, N. E. (2024). Healthcare consumer acceptability of routine use of the EQ-5D-5L in clinical care: A cross-sectional survey. Quality of Life Research, 33(5), 1307–1321. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-024-03598-z

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Herdman, M., Gudex, C., Lloyd, A., Janssen, M. F., Kind, P., Parkin, D., Bonsel, G., & Badia, X. (2011). Development and preliminary testing of the new five-level version of EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L). Quality of Life Research, 20, 1727–1736. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-011-9903-x

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

King, N., Crawford, S., Wenden, F., Moss, N. E. G., & Wade, D. T. (1995). The Rivermead post concussion symptoms questionnaire: A measure of symptoms commonly experienced after head injury and its reliability. Journal of Neurology, 242(9), 587–592. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00868811

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Spronk, I., Pollinder, S., Bonsel, G. J., Janssen, M. F., & Haagsma, J. A. EQ-5D-5L improves its psychometric performance in the general population. Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes, 6,1. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41687-021-00406-x

de Graaf, J. A., Kuijpers, M. M. T., Visser-Meily, J. M. A., Kappelle, L. J., & Post, M. W. M. (2020). Validity of an enhanced EQ-5D-5L measure with an added cognitive dimension in patients with stroke. Clinical Rehabilitation, 34(34), 545–550. https://doi.org/10.1177/0269215520907990

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Victorian Government (2021). Health and Allied services, managers and administrative workers (Victorian public health sector) (single interest employers) enterprise agreement 2021–2025.

Lapin, B. R., Honomichl, R., Thompson, N., Rose, S., Abelson, A., Deal, C., & Katzan, I. L. (2021). Patient-reported experience with patient-reported outcome measures in adult patients seen in rheumatology clinics. Quality of Life Research, 30, 1073–1082. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-020-02692-2

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Holden, R. J. (2020). A Simplified System Usability Scale (SUS) for Cognitively Impaired and Older Adults. Proceedings of the International Symposium on Human Factors and Ergonomics in Health Care, 9(1), 180–182. https://doi.org/10.1177/2327857920091021

Charlson, M. E., Pompei, P., Ales, K. L., & Mackenzie, C. R. (1987). A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: Development and validation. Journal of Chronic Diseases, 40(5), 373–383.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Lewis, J. R. (2018). The system usability scale: Past, present, and future. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction, 34(7), 577–590. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2018.1455307

Article 

Comments (0)

No login
gif