Hailey, D. (2003). Elements of effectiveness for health technology assessment programs. desLibris. Retrieved from https://policycommons.net/artifacts/1215076/elements-of-effectiveness-for-health-technology-assessment-programs/1768175/

Tantivess, S. (2008). Policy making and roles of health technology assessment. Journal of the Medical Association of Thailand, 91(Suppl 2), S88-99.

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Stratégie nationale de financement de la santé - Recherche Google. (n.d.). Retrieved April 5, 2023, from https://www.google.com/search?q=strat%C3%A9gie+nationale+de+financement+de+la+sant%C3%A9&rlz=1C1GCEA_enMA1016MA1016&oq=strat%C3%A9gie+nationale+de+financement+de+la+sant%C3%A9&aqs=chrome..69i57j0i512l2.342j0j7&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8

Azizi, A., Achak, D., Aboudi, K., Saad, E., Nejjari, C., Nouira, Y., & Marfak, A. (2020). Health-related quality of life and behavior-related lifestyle changes due to the COVID-19 home confinement: Dataset from a Moroccan sample. Data in Brief. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2020.106239

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Boutib, A., Chergaoui, S., Azizi, A., Achak, D., Saad, E. M., Hilali, A., & Marfak, A. (2024). Health-related quality of life among Moroccan women after vaginal birth and cesarean section: Cross-sectional study. Heliyon. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e32276

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Achak, D., El-Ammari, A., Azizi, A., Youlyouz-Marfak, I., Saad, E., Nejjari, C., & Marfak, A. (2023). Lifestyle habits determinants of health-related quality of life in Moroccan College students. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph20032394

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Azizi, A., Achak, D., Saad, E., Hilali, A., Nejjari, C., Khalis, M., & Marfak, A. (2022). Health-Related Quality of Life of Moroccan COVID-19 Survivors: A Case-Control Study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(14), 8804. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19148804

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Traki, L., Rostom, S., Tahiri, L., Bahiri, R., Harzy, T., Abouqal, R., & Hajjaj-Hassouni, N. (2014). Responsiveness of the EuroQol EQ-5D and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) in rheumatoid arthritis patients receiving tocilizumab. Clinical Rheumatology, 33(8), 1055–1060. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10067-014-2609-z

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Marfak, A., Youlyouz-Marfak, I., El Achhab, Y., Saad, E., Nejjari, C., Hilali, A., & Turman, J. (2020). Improved RIDIT statistic approach provides more intuitive and informative interpretation of EQ-5D data. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 18(1), 63. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-020-01313-3

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Drummond, M. F., Sculpher, M. J., Claxton, K., Stoddart, G. L., & Torrance, G. W. (2015). Methods for the economic evaluation of health care programmes (4th ed.). Oxford University Press.

Google Scholar 

Sassi, F. (2006). Calculating QALYs, comparing QALY and DALY calculations. Health Policy and Planning, 21(5), 402–408. https://doi.org/10.1093/heapol/czl018

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Cleland, J., Hutchinson, C., Khadka, J., Milte, R., & Ratcliffe, J. (2019). A review of the development and application of generic preference-based instruments with the older population. Applied Health Economics and Health Policy, 17(6), 781–801. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40258-019-00512-4

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Roudijk, B., Donders, A. R. T., Stalmeier, P. F. M., Luo, N., Viney, R., Andrade, M. V., & Tongsiri, S. (2019). Cultural values: Can they explain differences in health utilities between countries? Medical Decision Making, 39(5), 605–616. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989X19841587

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Richardson, J., Khan, M. A., Iezzi, A., & Maxwell, A. (2015). Comparing and explaining differences in the magnitude, content, and sensitivity of utilities predicted by the EQ-5D, SF-6D, HUI 3, 15D, QWB, and AQoL-8D multiattribute utility instruments. Medical Decision Making, 35(3), 276–291. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989X14543107

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kennedy-Martin, M., Slaap, B., Herdman, M., van Reenen, M., Kennedy-Martin, T., Greiner, W., & Boye, K. S. (2020). Which multi-attribute utility instruments are recommended for use in cost-utility analysis? A review of national health technology assessment (HTA) guidelines. The European Journal of Health Economics, 21(8), 1245–1257. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10198-020-01195-8

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Rencz, F., Gulácsi, L., Drummond, M., Golicki, D., Prevolnik Rupel, V., Simon, J., & Péntek, M. (2016). EQ-5D in central and eastern Europe: 2000–2015. Quality of Life Research, 25(11), 2693–2710. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-016-1375-6

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. (2013). Guide to the Methods of Technology Appraisal 2013. London: National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK395867/

Qian, X., Tan, R.L.-Y., Chuang, L.-H., & Luo, N. (2020). Measurement properties of commonly used generic preference-based measures in east and south-east Asia: A systematic review. PharmacoEconomics, 38(2), 159–170. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40273-019-00854-w

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Finch, A. P., Brazier, J. E., & Mukuria, C. (2018). What is the evidence for the performance of generic preference-based measures? A systematic overview of reviews. The European Journal of Health Economics, 19(4), 557–570. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10198-017-0902-x

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Brooks, R. (1996). EuroQol: The current state of play. Health Policy (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 37(1), 53–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/0168-8510(96)00822-6

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Herdman, M., Gudex, C., Lloyd, A., Janssen, M., Kind, P., Parkin, D., & Badia, X. (2011). Development and preliminary testing of the new five-level version of EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L). Quality of Life Research, 20(10), 1727–1736. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-011-9903-x

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Feng, Y.-S., Kohlmann, T., Janssen, M. F., & Buchholz, I. (2021). Psychometric properties of the EQ-5D-5L: A systematic review of the literature. Quality of Life Research, 30(3), 647–673. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11136-020-02688-y

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Devlin, N., Pickard, S., & Busschbach, J. (2022). The development of the EQ-5D-5L and its value sets. In N. Devlin, B. Roudijk, & K. Ludwig (Eds.), Value sets for EQ-5D-5L: A compendium, comparative review & user guide. Springer.

Chapter  Google Scholar 

PNS396 Valuing health related quality of life in Morocco: An EQ-5D-3L value set—Value in health. (n.d.). Retrieved 18 Dec 2024, from https://www.valueinhealthjournal.com/article/S1098-3015(19)34674-1/fulltext

Janssen, M. F., Bonsel, G. J., & Luo, N. (2018). Is EQ-5D-5L better than EQ-5D-3L? A head-to-head comparison of descriptive systems and value sets from seven countries. PharmacoEconomics, 36(6), 675–697. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40273-018-0623-8

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Xie, F., Pickard, A. S., Krabbe, P. F. M., Revicki, D., Viney, R., Devlin, N., & Feeny, D. (2015). A checklist for reporting valuation studies of multi-attribute utility-based instruments (CREATE). PharmacoEconomics, 33(8), 867–877. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40273-015-0292-9

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Stolk, E., Ludwig, K., Rand, K., van Hout, B., & Ramos-Goñi, J. M. (2019). Overview, update, and lessons learned from the international EQ-5D-5L valuation work: Version 2 of the EQ-5D-5L valuation protocol. Value in Health, 22(1), 23–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2018.05.010

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Gauthier, C. (n.d.). Projections de la population totale du Maroc par âge simple et sexe 2014–2050. Site institutionnel du Haut-Commissariat au Plan du Royaume du Maroc. Retrieved 1 Mar 2023, from https://www.hcp.ma/Projections-de-la-population-totale-du-Maroc-par-age-simple-et-sexe-2014-2050_a2209.html

Oppe, M., Rand-Hendriksen, K., Shah, K., Ramos-Goñi, J. M., & Luo, N. (2016). EuroQol protocols for time trade-off valuation of health outcomes. PharmacoEconomics, 34(10), 993–1004. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40273-016-0404-1

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Oppe, M., & Hout, B. (2017). The “power” of eliciting EQ-5D-5L values: The experimental design of the EQ-VT.

Ramos-Goñi, J. M., Oppe, M., Slaap, B., Busschbach, J. J. V., & Stolk, E. (2017). Quality control process for EQ-5D-5L valuation studies. Value in Health, 20(3), 466–473. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2016.10.012

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Tobin, J. (1958). Estimation of relationships for limited dependent variables. Econometrica, 26(1), 24. https://doi.org/10.2307/1907382

Article  Google Scholar 

Ludwig, K., Graf von der Schulenburg, J.-M., & Greiner, W. (2018). German value set for the EQ-5D-5L. PharmacoEconomics, 36(6), 663–674. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40273-018-0615-8

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Shah, K. K., Ramos-Goñi, J. M., Kreimeier, S., & Devlin, N. J. (2020). An exploration