After removing duplicates from 587 reviews, 517 remained for title and abstract assessment, and 72 were retrieved for full-text review. Finally, 50 systematic reviews met the eligibility criteria and were included in the quality assessment. The IRR for title/abstract screening and full-text screening was k = 0.58001 and k = 0.75294, respectively. Figure 1 outlines the flow of searches through the inclusion process.
Fig. 1Flow diagram indicating selection of articles
Study qualityThe critical appraisal scores of the 50 reviews ranged from 3 to 11; the median (interquartile) score was 11 (9.5, 11). Thirteen reviews (26%) did not assess the potential presence of publication bias and its impact on the results. Ten reviews (20%) either did not have evidence or were unclear regarding independent appraisal. Seven reviews (14%) either did not have evidence or were unclear regarding the study combination. A summary of the methodological quality of each criterion from the included reviews is presented in Table 1.
Table 1 Summary of the methodological quality of each criterion from the included reviewsCharacteristics of included reviewsTable 2 reports the characteristics of the reviews included in this umbrella analysis. The 50 included reviews were published between 2007 and 2024, and 33 included a meta-analysis.
Table 2 Summary of included reviewsThree main aspects of sleep were observed: sleep apnoea (including sleep-disordered breathing), restless legs syndrome (including periodic limb movement syndrome) and other sleep disturbances (including sleep quality, poor sleep, insomnia, and total sleep time). Most reviews (72%, 36 reviews) were on other sleep disturbances, followed by seven reviews each on sleep disorders in restless legs syndrome and sleep apnoea. Five main focuses were identified in the included reviews: (1). Interventions (58%, 29 reviews), (2). Prevalence (28%, 14 reviews), (3). Health outcomes (10%, 5 reviews), (4). Determinants of sleep (2%, 1 review), and (5). Patient experience (2%, 1 review).
The study populations mainly consisted of patients on haemodialysis (HD) (44%, 22 reviews), followed by mixed stages of CKD patients (32%, 16 reviews) and a mix of kidney replacement therapy (KRT) (16%, 8 reviews). Fewer reviews examined specific groups, such as CKD not on dialysis (1 review), CKD pre-dialysis (1 review), elderly individuals (> 60 years old) with CKD receiving conservative management (1 review) and peritoneal dialysis (PD) patients (1 review). Instruments used to report sleep disturbances were not reported in three reviews [24, 34, 35]. A detailed description of the instruments is presented in Table 2.
PrevalenceSleep disturbancesThe prevalence of sleep disturbances was investigated in three systematic reviews and four meta-analyses. The narrative findings from the three systematic reviews reported that sleep disturbances were one of the most prevalent symptoms in CKD patients [1], with a prevalence of over 40% [15, 36]. There was a slight study overlap among four meta-analyses (CCA: 1.55%, 129 primary studies). The pooled results from four meta-analyses [14, 37,38,39] demonstrated that the overall prevalence of sleep disturbance in people with CKD was 55% (95% CI 41, 69). The pooled prevalence of sleep disturbances for HD patients [14, 37, 39], CKD patients not receiving KRT [14, 38] and transplant recipients [14, 38] was 58% (95% CI 41, 74), 52% (95% CI 45, 59), and 34% (95% CI 23, 46), respectively (Fig. 2). A complete list of overlap graphs is included in Supplementary Table 3.
Fig. 2Summary pooled prevalence of sleep disturbances to different stages of CKD
Sleep apnoeaSleep apnoea prevalence was investigated in three meta-analyses and one systematic review. The systematic review [40] reported the prevalence of central sleep apnoea as 9.6% in people with CKD. There was a high overlap among the meta-analyses [16, 41, 42](CCA: 10.08%, 122 primary studies). Therefore, the prevalence is reported based on the most recent meta-analysis [16] that included 107 primary studies, demonstrating that the overall prevalence for CKD patients not on dialysis was 59% (95% CI 42, 71) and 49% (95% CI 47, 52) for the end-stage kidney disease population.
Restless legs syndromeThree meta-analyses reported the prevalence of restless legs syndrome, and the overlap among these meta-analyses was very high (CCA: 23.08%, 127 primary studies). Therefore, the prevalence is reported based on the most recent review [17] that included 97 primary studies, demonstrating that the overall prevalence of restless legs syndrome in HD patients was 27.2%. Of the other two meta-analyses, one reported the prevalence across different stages of CKD [43], which showed a lower prevalence in the early stages of CKD (9.9%) and transplant recipients (6.7%). The prevalence of restless legs syndrome in Iranian HD patients was reported at 50% [34].
InterventionsA total of twenty-nine reviews reported the effectiveness of interventions in improving sleep disturbances [18,19,20, 44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58,59,60,61,62], sleep apnoea [63, 64] and restless legs syndrome [21, 65,66,67]. These interventions were categorised into 12 groups of intervention namely; acupressure [18, 20, 48,49,50, 68, 69], exercise [18, 19, 55, 56, 65, 67, 68], aromatherapy [44, 46, 70], mindfulness [59, 60, 68], dialysis [53, 54, 63, 64], muscle relaxation [18, 58], music [57], acupuncture [51, 52], yoga [50, 61], combination of non-pharmacological [66], nurse-led disease management [62], and combination of pharmacological interventions [18, 21, 67]. Table 3 presents a summary of the results of interventions from the review and the overlap among reviews.
Table 3 Summary of outcomes of interventions and the overlap among reviewsSleep disturbancesAcupressureThe effects of acupressure on sleep quality were reported in two systematic reviews and five meta-analyses. The two systematic reviews presented inconsistent results, with one including three studies [69] and the other six studies [50](Table 2). The overlap among the five meta-analysis reviews [18, 20, 48, 49, 68]was very high (CCA: 20.90%). Consequently, the pooled effect of acupressure was calculated from two non-overlapped meta-analysis [49, 68] and a Cochrane review [18], which found no significant difference in sleep quality with acupressure (mean difference (MD): – 0.51, 95% CI – 2.75, 1.73).
ExerciseThe effects of exercise on sleep quality were reported in four meta-analyses [18,
Comments (0)