Transperitoneal vs retroperitoneal robotic partial nephrectomy: a meta-analysis and systematic review of propensity-matched studies

Ferlay J, Steliarova-Foucher E, Lortet-Tieulent J et al (2013) Cancer incidence and mortality patterns in Europe: estimates for 40 countries in 2012. Eur J Cancer 49(6):1374–1403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2012.12.027

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Escudier B, Porta C, Schmidinger M et al (2019) Renal cell carcinoma: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up†. Ann Oncol 30(5):706–720. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdz056

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Huang WC, Elkin EB, Levey AS, Jang TL, Russo P (2009) Partial nephrectomy versus radical nephrectomy in patients with small renal tumors–is there a difference in mortality and cardiovascular outcomes? J Urol 181(1):55–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2008.09.017

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Attawettayanon W, Kazama A, Yasuda Y et al (2023) Thermal ablation versus partial nephrectomy for cT1 renal mass in a solitary kidney: a matched cohort comparative analysis. Ann Surg Oncol. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-023-14646-2

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Gettman MT, Blute ML, Chow GK, Neururer R, Bartsch G, Peschel R (2004) Robotic-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: technique and initial clinical experience with DaVinci robotic system. Urology 64(5):914–918. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2004.06.049

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Peyronnet B, Seisen T, Oger E et al (2016) Comparison of 1800 robotic and open partial nephrectomies for renal tumors. Ann Surg Oncol 23(13):4277–4283. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-016-5411-0

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Campbell S, Uzzo RG, Allaf ME et al (2017) Renal mass and localized renal cancer: AUA guideline. J Urol 198(3):520–529. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2017.04.100

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Hu JC, Treat E, Filson CP et al (2014) Technique and outcomes of robot-assisted retroperitoneoscopic partial nephrectomy: a multicenter study. Eur Urol 66(3):542–549. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2014.04.028

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Marconi L, Challacombe B (2018) Robotic partial nephrectomy for posterior renal tumours: Rretro or transperitoneal approach? Eur Urol Focus 4(5):632–635. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euf.2018.08.003

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kieran K, Montgomery JS, Daignault S, Roberts WW, Wolf JS (2007) Comparison of intraoperative parameters and perioperative complications of retroperitoneal and transperitoneal approaches to laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: support for a retroperitoneal approach in selected patients. J Endourol 21(7):754–759. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2007.0337

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Marszalek M, Chromecki T, Al-Ali BM et al (2011) Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: A matched-pair comparison of the transperitoneal versus the retroperitoneal approach. Urology 77(1):109–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2010.02.057

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Zhou J, Liu ZH, Cao DH et al (2021) Retroperitoneal or transperitoneal approach in robot-assisted partial nephrectomy, which one is better? Cancer Med 10(10):3299–3308. https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.3888

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Carbonara U, Eun D, Derweesh I et al (2021) Retroperitoneal versus transepritoneal robot-assisted partial nephrectomy for postero-lateral renal masses: an international multicenter analysis. World J Urol 39(11):4175–4182. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-021-03741-2

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM et al (2021) The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 372:n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

McGrath S, Zhao X, Steele R, Thombs BD, Benedetti A (2020) DEPRESsion Screening Data (DEPRESSD) Collaboration. Estimating the sample mean and standard deviation from commonly reported quantiles in meta-analysis. Stat Methods Med Res 29(9):2520–2537. https://doi.org/10.1177/0962280219889080

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Lau J, Ioannidis JPA, Terrin N, Schmid CH, Olkin I (2006) The case of the misleading funnel plot. BMJ 333(7568):597–600. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.333.7568.597

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Choo SH, Lee SY, Sung HH et al (2014) Transperitoneal versus retroperitoneal robotic partial nephrectomy: matched-pair comparisons by nephrometry scores. World J Urol 32(6):1523–1529. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-014-1312-7

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Eraky A, Hamann C, Harke NN, Tropmann-Frick M, Jünemann KP, Osmonov D (2021) Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: a single-center matched-pair analysis of the retroperitoneal versus the transperitoneal approach. Turk J Urol 47(4):305–312. https://doi.org/10.5152/tud.2021.21008

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Harke NN, Darr C, Radtke JP et al (2021) Retroperitoneal versus transperitoneal robotic partial nephrectomy: a multicenter matched-pair analysis. Eur Urol Focus 7(6):1363–1370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euf.2020.08.012

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Laviana AA, Tan HJ, Hu JC, Weizer AZ, Chang SS, Barocas DA (2018) Retroperitoneal versus transperitoneal robotic-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: a matched-pair, bicenter analysis with cost comparison using time-driven activity-based costing. Curr Opin Urol 28(2):108–114. https://doi.org/10.1097/MOU.0000000000000483

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Maurice MJ, Kaouk JH, Ramirez D et al (2017) Robotic partial nephrectomy for posterior tumors through a retroperitoneal approach offers decreased length of stay compared with the transperitoneal approach: a propensity-matched analysis. J Endourol 31(2):158–162. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2016.0603

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Mittakanti HR, Heulitt G, Li HF, Porter JR (2020) Transperitoneal vs. retroperitoneal robotic partial nephrectomy: a matched-paired analysis. World J Urol 38(5):1093–1099. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-019-02903-7

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Paulucci DJ, Beksac AT, Porter J et al (2019) A multi-institutional propensity score matched comparison of transperitoneal and retroperitoneal partial nephrectomy for cT1 posterior tumors. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech 29(1):29–34. https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2018.0313

Article  Google Scholar 

Sharma G, Shah M, Ahluwalia P et al (2022) Comparison of perioperative outcomes following transperitoneal versus retroperitoneal robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: a propensity-matched analysis of VCQI database. World J Urol 40(9):2283–2291. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-022-04101-4

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Takagi T, Yoshida K, Kondo T et al (2021) Comparisons of surgical outcomes between transperitoneal and retroperitoneal approaches in robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for lateral renal tumors: a propensity score-matched comparative analysis. J Robotic Surg 15(1):99–104. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-020-01086-3

Article  Google Scholar 

Hughes-Hallett A, Patki P, Patel N, Barber NJ, Sullivan M, Thilagarajah R (2013) Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: a comparison of the transperitoneal and retroperitoneal approaches. J Endourol 27(7):869–874. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2013.0023

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Stroup SP, Hamilton ZA, Marshall MT et al (2017) Comparison of retroperitoneal and transperitoneal robotic partial nephrectomy for pentafecta perioperative and renal functional outcomes. World J Urol 35(11):1721–1728. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-017-2062-0

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kim EH, Larson JA, Potretzke AM, Hulsey NK, Bhayani SB, Figenshau RS (2015) Retroperitoneal robot-assisted partial nephrectomy for posterior renal masses is associated with earlier hospital discharge: a single-institution retrospective comparison. J Endourol 29(10):1137–1142. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2015.0076

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Shrivastava N, Bhargava P, Sharma G, Choudhary GR (2024) Transperitoneal versus retroperitoneal robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Urol 42(1):83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-024-04796-7

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Lanfranco AR, Castellanos AE, Desai JP, Meyers WC (2004) Robotic surgery: a current perspective. Ann Surg 239(1):14–21. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sla.0000103020.19595.7d

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central 

Comments (0)

No login
gif