Ferlay J, Steliarova-Foucher E, Lortet-Tieulent J et al (2013) Cancer incidence and mortality patterns in Europe: estimates for 40 countries in 2012. Eur J Cancer 49(6):1374–1403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2012.12.027
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Escudier B, Porta C, Schmidinger M et al (2019) Renal cell carcinoma: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up†. Ann Oncol 30(5):706–720. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdz056
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Huang WC, Elkin EB, Levey AS, Jang TL, Russo P (2009) Partial nephrectomy versus radical nephrectomy in patients with small renal tumors–is there a difference in mortality and cardiovascular outcomes? J Urol 181(1):55–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2008.09.017
Attawettayanon W, Kazama A, Yasuda Y et al (2023) Thermal ablation versus partial nephrectomy for cT1 renal mass in a solitary kidney: a matched cohort comparative analysis. Ann Surg Oncol. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-023-14646-2
Gettman MT, Blute ML, Chow GK, Neururer R, Bartsch G, Peschel R (2004) Robotic-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: technique and initial clinical experience with DaVinci robotic system. Urology 64(5):914–918. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2004.06.049
Peyronnet B, Seisen T, Oger E et al (2016) Comparison of 1800 robotic and open partial nephrectomies for renal tumors. Ann Surg Oncol 23(13):4277–4283. https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-016-5411-0
Campbell S, Uzzo RG, Allaf ME et al (2017) Renal mass and localized renal cancer: AUA guideline. J Urol 198(3):520–529. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2017.04.100
Hu JC, Treat E, Filson CP et al (2014) Technique and outcomes of robot-assisted retroperitoneoscopic partial nephrectomy: a multicenter study. Eur Urol 66(3):542–549. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2014.04.028
Marconi L, Challacombe B (2018) Robotic partial nephrectomy for posterior renal tumours: Rretro or transperitoneal approach? Eur Urol Focus 4(5):632–635. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euf.2018.08.003
Kieran K, Montgomery JS, Daignault S, Roberts WW, Wolf JS (2007) Comparison of intraoperative parameters and perioperative complications of retroperitoneal and transperitoneal approaches to laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: support for a retroperitoneal approach in selected patients. J Endourol 21(7):754–759. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2007.0337
Marszalek M, Chromecki T, Al-Ali BM et al (2011) Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: A matched-pair comparison of the transperitoneal versus the retroperitoneal approach. Urology 77(1):109–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2010.02.057
Zhou J, Liu ZH, Cao DH et al (2021) Retroperitoneal or transperitoneal approach in robot-assisted partial nephrectomy, which one is better? Cancer Med 10(10):3299–3308. https://doi.org/10.1002/cam4.3888
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Carbonara U, Eun D, Derweesh I et al (2021) Retroperitoneal versus transepritoneal robot-assisted partial nephrectomy for postero-lateral renal masses: an international multicenter analysis. World J Urol 39(11):4175–4182. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-021-03741-2
Page MJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM et al (2021) The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 372:n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
McGrath S, Zhao X, Steele R, Thombs BD, Benedetti A (2020) DEPRESsion Screening Data (DEPRESSD) Collaboration. Estimating the sample mean and standard deviation from commonly reported quantiles in meta-analysis. Stat Methods Med Res 29(9):2520–2537. https://doi.org/10.1177/0962280219889080
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Lau J, Ioannidis JPA, Terrin N, Schmid CH, Olkin I (2006) The case of the misleading funnel plot. BMJ 333(7568):597–600. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.333.7568.597
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Choo SH, Lee SY, Sung HH et al (2014) Transperitoneal versus retroperitoneal robotic partial nephrectomy: matched-pair comparisons by nephrometry scores. World J Urol 32(6):1523–1529. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-014-1312-7
Eraky A, Hamann C, Harke NN, Tropmann-Frick M, Jünemann KP, Osmonov D (2021) Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: a single-center matched-pair analysis of the retroperitoneal versus the transperitoneal approach. Turk J Urol 47(4):305–312. https://doi.org/10.5152/tud.2021.21008
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Harke NN, Darr C, Radtke JP et al (2021) Retroperitoneal versus transperitoneal robotic partial nephrectomy: a multicenter matched-pair analysis. Eur Urol Focus 7(6):1363–1370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euf.2020.08.012
Laviana AA, Tan HJ, Hu JC, Weizer AZ, Chang SS, Barocas DA (2018) Retroperitoneal versus transperitoneal robotic-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: a matched-pair, bicenter analysis with cost comparison using time-driven activity-based costing. Curr Opin Urol 28(2):108–114. https://doi.org/10.1097/MOU.0000000000000483
Maurice MJ, Kaouk JH, Ramirez D et al (2017) Robotic partial nephrectomy for posterior tumors through a retroperitoneal approach offers decreased length of stay compared with the transperitoneal approach: a propensity-matched analysis. J Endourol 31(2):158–162. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2016.0603
Mittakanti HR, Heulitt G, Li HF, Porter JR (2020) Transperitoneal vs. retroperitoneal robotic partial nephrectomy: a matched-paired analysis. World J Urol 38(5):1093–1099. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-019-02903-7
Paulucci DJ, Beksac AT, Porter J et al (2019) A multi-institutional propensity score matched comparison of transperitoneal and retroperitoneal partial nephrectomy for cT1 posterior tumors. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech 29(1):29–34. https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2018.0313
Sharma G, Shah M, Ahluwalia P et al (2022) Comparison of perioperative outcomes following transperitoneal versus retroperitoneal robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: a propensity-matched analysis of VCQI database. World J Urol 40(9):2283–2291. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-022-04101-4
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Takagi T, Yoshida K, Kondo T et al (2021) Comparisons of surgical outcomes between transperitoneal and retroperitoneal approaches in robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for lateral renal tumors: a propensity score-matched comparative analysis. J Robotic Surg 15(1):99–104. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-020-01086-3
Hughes-Hallett A, Patki P, Patel N, Barber NJ, Sullivan M, Thilagarajah R (2013) Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: a comparison of the transperitoneal and retroperitoneal approaches. J Endourol 27(7):869–874. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2013.0023
Stroup SP, Hamilton ZA, Marshall MT et al (2017) Comparison of retroperitoneal and transperitoneal robotic partial nephrectomy for pentafecta perioperative and renal functional outcomes. World J Urol 35(11):1721–1728. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-017-2062-0
Kim EH, Larson JA, Potretzke AM, Hulsey NK, Bhayani SB, Figenshau RS (2015) Retroperitoneal robot-assisted partial nephrectomy for posterior renal masses is associated with earlier hospital discharge: a single-institution retrospective comparison. J Endourol 29(10):1137–1142. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2015.0076
Shrivastava N, Bhargava P, Sharma G, Choudhary GR (2024) Transperitoneal versus retroperitoneal robot-assisted partial nephrectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Urol 42(1):83. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-024-04796-7
Lanfranco AR, Castellanos AE, Desai JP, Meyers WC (2004) Robotic surgery: a current perspective. Ann Surg 239(1):14–21. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.sla.0000103020.19595.7d
Comments (0)