Inacio MCS, Paxton EW, Graves SE et al (2017) Projected increase in total knee arthroplasty in the United States—an alternative projection model. Osteoarthr Cartil 25:1797–1803. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joca.2017.07.022

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Sloan M, Premkumar A, Sheth NP (2018) Projected volume of primary total joint arthroplasty in the US, 2014 to 2030. J Bone Joint Surg Am 100:1455–1460. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.17.01617

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Bourne RB, Chesworth BM, Davis AM et al (2010) Patient satisfaction after total knee arthroplasty: Who is satisfied and who is not? Clin Orthop Relat Res 468:57–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-009-1119-9

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Luna IE, Kehlet H, Peterson B et al (2017) Early patient-reported outcomes versus objective function after total hip and knee arthroplasty: a prospective cohort study. Bone Joint J 99-B:1167–1175. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.99B9.BJJ-2016-1343.R1

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Arpey NC, Tanenbaum JE, Selph TJ et al (2024) Quantifying patient expectations for total knee arthroplasty: expectations for improvement are greater than minimal clinically important difference. J Arthroplasty 39:S158–S162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2024.05.015

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Husain A, Lee G-C (2015) Establishing realistic patient expectations following total knee arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 23:707–713. https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOS-D-14-00049

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Rullán PJ, Grits D, Potluri A et al (2023) Identifying trends and quantifying growth for technological innovation in knee arthroplasty: an analysis of a patent database (1990 to 2020). J Knee Surg 36:1209–1217. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1756503

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Shatrov J, Parker D (2020) Computer and robotic–assisted total knee arthroplasty: a review of outcomes. J EXP ORTOP 7:70. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40634-020-00278-y

Article  Google Scholar 

Kayani B, Haddad FS (2019) Robotic total knee arthroplasty: clinical outcomes and directions for future research. Bone Joint Res 8:438–442. https://doi.org/10.1302/2046-3758.810.BJR-2019-0175

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Mattei L, Pellegrino P, Calò M et al (2016) Patient specific instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty: a state of the art. Ann Transl Med 4:126. https://doi.org/10.21037/atm.2016.03.33

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Figueroa F, Parker D, Fritsch B, Oussedik S (2018) New and evolving technologies for knee arthroplasty—computer navigation and robotics: state of the art. J ISAKOS 3:46–54. https://doi.org/10.1136/jisakos-2017-000146

Article  Google Scholar 

Hampp E, Chughtai M, Scholl L et al (2019) Robotic-arm assisted total knee arthroplasty demonstrated greater accuracy and precision to plan compared with manual techniques. J Knee Surg 32:239–250. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1641729

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kayani B, Konan S, Ayuob A et al (2019) Robotic technology in total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review. EFORT Open Rev 4:611–617. https://doi.org/10.1302/2058-5241.4.190022

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Batailler C, Fernandez A, Swan J et al (2021) MAKO CT-based robotic arm-assisted system is a reliable procedure for total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 29:3585–3598. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-020-06283-z

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Masilamani AS, Jayakumar T, Mulpur P et al (2023) Functional alignment is associated with increased incidence of pre-balance, reduced soft-tissue release, and post-operative pain compared to mechanical alignment in patients undergoing simultaneous bilateral robotic-assisted TKA. J Robot Surg 17:2919–2927

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kayani B, Konan S, Tahmassebi J et al (2018) Robotic-arm assisted total knee arthroplasty is associated with improved early functional recovery and reduced time to hospital discharge compared with conventional jig-based total knee arthroplasty: a prospective cohort study. Bone Joint J 100-B:930–937. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.100B7.BJJ-2017-1449.R1

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Chin BZ, Tan SSH, Chua KCX et al (2021) Robot-assisted versus conventional total and unicompartmental knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis of radiological and functional outcomes. J Knee Surg 34:1064–1075. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1701440

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Desai KB, Mulpur P, Jayakumar T et al (2023) Adoption of robotics in arthroplasty—a survey of perceptions, utilization and challenges with technology amongst Indian surgeons. J Orthop 46:51–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jor.2023.10.019

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Peterman NJ, Pagani N, Mann R et al (2024) Disparities in access to robotic knee arthroplasty: a geospatial analysis. J Arthroplasty 39:864–870. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2023.10.012

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Lan Y-T, Chen Y-W, Niu R et al (2023) The trend and future projection of technology-assisted total knee arthroplasty in the United States. Int J Med Robot 19:e2478. https://doi.org/10.1002/rcs.2478

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Antonios JK, Korber S, Sivasundaram L et al (2019) Trends in computer navigation and robotic assistance for total knee arthroplasty in the United States: an analysis of patient and hospital factors. Arthroplasty Today 5:88–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artd.2019.01.002

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Boylan M, Suchman K, Vigdorchik J et al (2018) Technology-assisted hip and knee arthroplasties: an analysis of utilization trends. J Arthroplasty 33:1019–1023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2017.11.033

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Petursson G, Fenstad AM, Gøthesen Ø et al (2018) Computer-assisted compared with conventional total knee replacement: a multicenter parallel-group randomized controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg 100:1265–1274. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.17.01338

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Marchand KB, Moody R, Scholl LY et al (2023) Results of robotic-assisted versus manual total knee arthroplasty at 2-year follow-up. J Knee Surg 36:159–166. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1731349

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Wang JC, Piple AS, Hill WJ et al (2022) Computer-navigated and robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty: increasing in popularity without increasing complications. J Arthroplasty 37:2358–2364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2022.06.014

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ong CB, Buchan GBJ, Acuña AJ et al (2023) Cost-effectiveness of a novel, fluoroscopy-based robotic-assisted total hip arthroplasty system: a Markov analysis. Int J Med Robot. https://doi.org/10.1002/rcs.2582

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Maldonado DR, Go CC, Kyin C et al (2021) Robotic arm-assisted total hip arthroplasty is more cost-effective than manual total hip arthroplasty: a markov model analysis. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 29:e168–e177. https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOS-D-20-00498

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Cool CL, Jacofsky DJ, Seeger KA et al (2019) A 90-day episode-of-care cost analysis of robotic-arm assisted total knee arthroplasty. J Comp Eff Res 8:327–336. https://doi.org/10.2217/cer-2018-0136

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Bendich I, Kapadia M, Alpaugh K et al (2021) Trends of utilization and 90-day complication rates for computer-assisted navigation and robotic assistance for total knee arthroplasty in the United States From 2010 to 2018. Arthroplasty Today 11:134–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artd.2021.08.005

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Hsiue PP, Chen CJ, Villalpando C et al (2020) Trends and patient factors associated with technology-assisted total hip arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2014. Arthroplasty Today 6:112-117.e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artd.2019.12.009

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Sodhi N, Khlopas A, Piuzzi NS et al (2018) The learning curve associated with robotic total knee arthroplasty. J Knee Sur