Effects of emotions on IVF/ICSI outcomes in infertile women: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Zegers-Hochschild F, Adamson GD, Dyer S, et al. The international glossary on infertility and fertility care, 2017. Fertil Steril. 2017;108(3):393–406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.06.005.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

WHO. Infertility prevalence estimates, 1990–2021. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2023. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/978920068315 . Accessed 12 Sep 2024.

Wennerholm UB, Bergh C. Perinatal outcome in children born after assisted reproductive technologies. Upsala J Med Sci. 2020;125(2):158–66. https://doi.org/10.1080/03009734.2020.1726534.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Bai F, Wang DY, Fan YJ, et al. Assisted reproductive technology service availability, efficacy and safety in mainland China: 2016. Hum Reprod. 2020;35(2):446–52. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dez245.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Chambers GM, Dyer S, Zegers-Hochschild F, et al. International committee for monitoring assisted reproductive technologies world report: assisted reproductive technology, 2014†. Hum Reprod. 2021;36(11):2921–34. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deab198.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Szamatowicz M. Assisted reproductive technology in reproductive medicine - possibilities and limitations. Ginekol Pol. 2016;87(12):820–3. https://doi.org/10.5603/gp.2016.0095.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Holley SR, Pasch LA, Bleil ME, et al. Prevalence and predictors of major depressive disorder for fertility treatment patients and their partners. Fertil Steril. 2015;103(5):1332–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.02.018.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Simionescu G, Doroftei B, Maftei R, et al. The complex relationship between infertility and psychological distress (Review). Exp Ther Med. 2021;21(4):306. https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2021.9737.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Rooney KL, Domar AD. The relationship between stress and infertility. Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2018;20(1):41–7. https://doi.org/10.31887/DCNS.2018.20.1/klrooney.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Jiang L, Zeng T, Wu M, et al. Infertility psychological distress in women undergoing assisted reproductive treatment: a grounded theory study. J Clin Nurs. 2024;33(9):3642–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.17195.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Choi SH, Shapiro H, Robinson GE, et al. Psychological side-effects of clomiphene citrate and human menopausal gonadotrophin. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol. 2005;26(2):93–100. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443610400022983.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Copp T, Kvesic D, Lieberman D, et al. Your hopes can run away with your realistic expectations: a qualitative study of women and men’s decision-making when undergoing multiple cycles of IVF. Hum Reprod Open. 2020;20250(4):hoaa059. https://doi.org/10.1093/hropen/hoaa059.

Article  Google Scholar 

Gupta A, Lu E, Thayer Z. The influence of assisted reproductive technologies-related stressors and social support on perceived stress and depression. BMC Womens Health. 2024;24(1):431. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-024-03262-1.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Song D, Jiang W, Hu S, et al. Identification of psychological symptom clusters and their influencing factors in women undergoing assisted reproductive technology in China: a cross-sectional study. Int J Womens Health. 2024;16:1493–504. https://doi.org/10.2147/ijwh.S468644.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Caparros-Gonzalez RA, Romero-Gonzalez B, Quesada-Soto JM, et al. Maternal hair cortisol levels affect neonatal development among women conceiving with assisted reproductive technology. J Reprod Infant Psychol. 2019;37(5):480–98. https://doi.org/10.1080/02646838.2019.1578949.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

García-Blanco A, Diago V, Hervás D, et al. Anxiety and depressive symptoms, and stress biomarkers in pregnant women after in vitro fertilization: a prospective cohort study. Hum Reprod. 2018;33(7):1237–46. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dey109.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Boivin J, Griffiths E, Venetis CA. Emotional distress in infertile women and failure of assisted reproductive technologies: meta-analysis of prospective psychosocial studies. Bmj-British Med J. 2011;342. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d223.

Purewal S, Chapman SCE, van den Akker OBA. Depression and state anxiety scores during assisted reproductive treatment are associated with outcome: a meta-analysis. Reprod Biomed Online. 2018;36(6):646–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2018.03.010.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Purewal S, Chapman SCE, van den Akker OBA. A systematic review and meta-analysis of psychological predictors of successful assisted reproductive technologies. BMC Res Notes. 2017;10(1):711. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-017-3049-z.

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Nicoloro-SantaBarbara J, Busso C, Moyer A, et al. Just relax and you’ll get pregnant? Meta-analysis examining women’s emotional distress and the outcome of assisted reproductive technology. Soc Sci Med. 2018;213:54–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.06.033.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Page MJ, Moher D, Bossuyt PM, et al. PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021;372:n160. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n160.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Wells G, et al. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in meta-analyses http://www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical_epidemiology/oxford.asp. Accessed 27 May 2024.

Forrest SJ, Siegert RJ, Krägeloh CU, et al. Generalizability theory distinguishes between state and trait anxiety. Psychol Assess. 2021;33(11):1080–8. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0001060.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

McGrath S, Zhao X, Steele R, et al. Estimating the sample mean and standard deviation from commonly reported quantiles in meta-analysis. Stat Methods Med Res. 2020;29(9):2520–37. https://doi.org/10.1177/0962280219889080.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, et al. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ. 2003;327(7414):557–60. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Egger M, Davey Smith G, Schneider M, et al. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ. 1997;315(7109):629–34. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.315.7109.629.

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Aimagambetova G, Issanov A, Terzic S, et al. The effect of psychological distress on IVF outcomes: reality or speculations? PLoS ONE. 2020;15(12):e0242024. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0242024.

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

An Y, Sun Z, Li L, et al. Relationship between psychological stress and reproductive outcome in women undergoing in vitro fertilization treatment: psychological and neurohormonal assessment. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2013;30(1):35–41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-012-9904-x.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Anderheim L, Holter H, Bergh C, et al. Does psychological stress affect the outcome of in vitro fertilization? Hum Reprod. 2005;20(10):2969–75. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dei219.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Bapayeva G, Aimagambetova G, Issanov A, et al. The effect of stress, anxiety and depression on in vitro fertilization outcome in Kazakhstani public clinical setting: a cross-sectional study. J Clin Med. 2021;10(5):937. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10050937.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Cheung CWC, Saravelos SH, Chan TYA, et al. A prospective observational study on the stress levels at the time of embryo transfer and pregnancy testing following in vitro fertilisation treatment: a comparison between women with different treatment outcomes. BJOG: Int J Obstetrics Gynaecol. 2019;126(2):271–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.15434.

Article  Google Scholar 

Cui Y, Yu H, Meng F, et al. Prospective study of pregnancy outcome between perceived stress and stress-related hormones. J of Obstet and Gynaecol Res. 2

Comments (0)

No login
gif