Zegers-Hochschild F, Adamson GD, Dyer S, et al. The international glossary on infertility and fertility care, 2017. Fertil Steril. 2017;108(3):393–406. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.06.005.
WHO. Infertility prevalence estimates, 1990–2021. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2023. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/978920068315 . Accessed 12 Sep 2024.
Wennerholm UB, Bergh C. Perinatal outcome in children born after assisted reproductive technologies. Upsala J Med Sci. 2020;125(2):158–66. https://doi.org/10.1080/03009734.2020.1726534.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Bai F, Wang DY, Fan YJ, et al. Assisted reproductive technology service availability, efficacy and safety in mainland China: 2016. Hum Reprod. 2020;35(2):446–52. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dez245.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Chambers GM, Dyer S, Zegers-Hochschild F, et al. International committee for monitoring assisted reproductive technologies world report: assisted reproductive technology, 2014†. Hum Reprod. 2021;36(11):2921–34. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deab198.
Szamatowicz M. Assisted reproductive technology in reproductive medicine - possibilities and limitations. Ginekol Pol. 2016;87(12):820–3. https://doi.org/10.5603/gp.2016.0095.
Holley SR, Pasch LA, Bleil ME, et al. Prevalence and predictors of major depressive disorder for fertility treatment patients and their partners. Fertil Steril. 2015;103(5):1332–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.02.018.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Simionescu G, Doroftei B, Maftei R, et al. The complex relationship between infertility and psychological distress (Review). Exp Ther Med. 2021;21(4):306. https://doi.org/10.3892/etm.2021.9737.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Rooney KL, Domar AD. The relationship between stress and infertility. Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2018;20(1):41–7. https://doi.org/10.31887/DCNS.2018.20.1/klrooney.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Jiang L, Zeng T, Wu M, et al. Infertility psychological distress in women undergoing assisted reproductive treatment: a grounded theory study. J Clin Nurs. 2024;33(9):3642–58. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.17195.
Choi SH, Shapiro H, Robinson GE, et al. Psychological side-effects of clomiphene citrate and human menopausal gonadotrophin. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol. 2005;26(2):93–100. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443610400022983.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Copp T, Kvesic D, Lieberman D, et al. Your hopes can run away with your realistic expectations: a qualitative study of women and men’s decision-making when undergoing multiple cycles of IVF. Hum Reprod Open. 2020;20250(4):hoaa059. https://doi.org/10.1093/hropen/hoaa059.
Gupta A, Lu E, Thayer Z. The influence of assisted reproductive technologies-related stressors and social support on perceived stress and depression. BMC Womens Health. 2024;24(1):431. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12905-024-03262-1.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Song D, Jiang W, Hu S, et al. Identification of psychological symptom clusters and their influencing factors in women undergoing assisted reproductive technology in China: a cross-sectional study. Int J Womens Health. 2024;16:1493–504. https://doi.org/10.2147/ijwh.S468644.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Caparros-Gonzalez RA, Romero-Gonzalez B, Quesada-Soto JM, et al. Maternal hair cortisol levels affect neonatal development among women conceiving with assisted reproductive technology. J Reprod Infant Psychol. 2019;37(5):480–98. https://doi.org/10.1080/02646838.2019.1578949.
García-Blanco A, Diago V, Hervás D, et al. Anxiety and depressive symptoms, and stress biomarkers in pregnant women after in vitro fertilization: a prospective cohort study. Hum Reprod. 2018;33(7):1237–46. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dey109.
Boivin J, Griffiths E, Venetis CA. Emotional distress in infertile women and failure of assisted reproductive technologies: meta-analysis of prospective psychosocial studies. Bmj-British Med J. 2011;342. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.d223.
Purewal S, Chapman SCE, van den Akker OBA. Depression and state anxiety scores during assisted reproductive treatment are associated with outcome: a meta-analysis. Reprod Biomed Online. 2018;36(6):646–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2018.03.010.
Purewal S, Chapman SCE, van den Akker OBA. A systematic review and meta-analysis of psychological predictors of successful assisted reproductive technologies. BMC Res Notes. 2017;10(1):711. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-017-3049-z.
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Nicoloro-SantaBarbara J, Busso C, Moyer A, et al. Just relax and you’ll get pregnant? Meta-analysis examining women’s emotional distress and the outcome of assisted reproductive technology. Soc Sci Med. 2018;213:54–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2018.06.033.
Page MJ, Moher D, Bossuyt PM, et al. PRISMA 2020 explanation and elaboration: updated guidance and exemplars for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ. 2021;372:n160. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n160.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Wells G, et al. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in meta-analyses http://www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical_epidemiology/oxford.asp. Accessed 27 May 2024.
Forrest SJ, Siegert RJ, Krägeloh CU, et al. Generalizability theory distinguishes between state and trait anxiety. Psychol Assess. 2021;33(11):1080–8. https://doi.org/10.1037/pas0001060.
McGrath S, Zhao X, Steele R, et al. Estimating the sample mean and standard deviation from commonly reported quantiles in meta-analysis. Stat Methods Med Res. 2020;29(9):2520–37. https://doi.org/10.1177/0962280219889080.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, et al. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ. 2003;327(7414):557–60. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Egger M, Davey Smith G, Schneider M, et al. Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ. 1997;315(7109):629–34. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.315.7109.629.
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Aimagambetova G, Issanov A, Terzic S, et al. The effect of psychological distress on IVF outcomes: reality or speculations? PLoS ONE. 2020;15(12):e0242024. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0242024.
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
An Y, Sun Z, Li L, et al. Relationship between psychological stress and reproductive outcome in women undergoing in vitro fertilization treatment: psychological and neurohormonal assessment. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2013;30(1):35–41. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-012-9904-x.
Anderheim L, Holter H, Bergh C, et al. Does psychological stress affect the outcome of in vitro fertilization? Hum Reprod. 2005;20(10):2969–75. https://doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dei219.
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Bapayeva G, Aimagambetova G, Issanov A, et al. The effect of stress, anxiety and depression on in vitro fertilization outcome in Kazakhstani public clinical setting: a cross-sectional study. J Clin Med. 2021;10(5):937. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm10050937.
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Cheung CWC, Saravelos SH, Chan TYA, et al. A prospective observational study on the stress levels at the time of embryo transfer and pregnancy testing following in vitro fertilisation treatment: a comparison between women with different treatment outcomes. BJOG: Int J Obstetrics Gynaecol. 2019;126(2):271–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.15434.
Cui Y, Yu H, Meng F, et al. Prospective study of pregnancy outcome between perceived stress and stress-related hormones. J of Obstet and Gynaecol Res. 2
Comments (0)