Picchetta L, Ottolini C, O’Neill H, Capalbo A. Investigating the significance of segmental aneuploidy findings in preimplantation embryos. F&S Science. 2023;4(2S):17–26.

Article  Google Scholar 

Eichler EE. Copy number variation and human disease. Nature Education. 2008;1(3):1.

Google Scholar 

Riggs ER, Andersen EF, Cherry AM, Kantarci S, Kearney H, Patel A, Raca G, Ritter DI, South ST, Thorland EC, Pineda-Alvarez D, Aradhya S, Martin CL. Technical standards for the interpretation and reporting of constitutional copy-number variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG) and the Clinical Genome Resource (ClinGen). Genet Med. 2020;22(2):245–57.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Oğuz S, Arslan UE, Kiper PÖŞ, Alikaşifoğlu M, Boduroğlu K, Utine GE. Diagnostic yield of microarrays in individuals with non-syndromic developmental delay and intellectual disability. J Intellect Disabil Res. 2021;65(12):1033–48.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Levy B, Wapner R. Prenatal diagnosis by chromosomal microarray analysis. Fertil Steril. 2018;109(2):201–12.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Brabbing-Goldstein D, Reches A, Svirsky R, Bar-Shira A, Yaron Y. Dilemmas in genetic counseling for low-penetrance neuro-susceptibility loci detected on prenatal chromosomal microarray analysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2018;218(2):247.e1-247.e12.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Girardi L, Serdarogullari M, Patassini C, Poli M, Fabiani M, Caroselli S, Coban O, Findikli N, Boynukalin FK, Bahceci M, Chopra R, Canipari R, Cimadomo D, Rienzi L, Ubaldi F, Hoffmann E, Rubio C, Simon C, Capalbo A. Incidence, origin, and predictive model for the detection and clinical management of segmental aneuploidies in human embryos. Am J Hum Genet. 2020;106(4):525–34.

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Navratil R, Horak J, Hornak M, Kubicek D, Balcova M, Tauwinklova G, Travnik P, Vesela K. Concordance of various chromosomal errors among different parts of the embryo and the value of re-biopsy in embryos with segmental aneuploidies. Mol Hum Reprod. 2020;26(4):269–76.

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Magli MC, Albanese C, Crippa A, Terzuoli G, La Sala G, Tabanelli C, Gianaroli L. Permanence of de novo segmental aneuploidy in sequential embryo biopsies. Hum Reprod. 2020;35(4):759–69.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kim J, Tao X, Cheng M, Steward A, Guo V, Zhan Y, Scott RT Jr, Jalas C. The concordance rates of an initial trophectoderm biopsy with the rest of the embryo using PGTseq, a targeted next-generation sequencing platform for preimplantation genetic testing-aneuploidy. Fertil Steril. 2022;117(2):315–23.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Cascante SD, Besser A, Lee HL, Wang F, McCaffrey C, Grifo JA. Blinded rebiopsy and analysis of noneuploid embryos with 2 distinct preimplantation genetic testing platforms for aneuploidy. Fertil Steril. 2023;120(6):1161–9.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Babariya D, Fragouli E, Alfarawati S, Spath K, Wells D. The incidence and origin of segmental aneuploidy in human oocytes and preimplantation embryos. Hum Reprod. 2017;32:2549–60.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Goodrich D, Xing T, Tao X, Lonczak A, Zhan Y, Landis J, Zimmerman R, Scott RT Jr, Treff NR. Evaluation of comprehensive chromosome screening platforms for the detection of mosaic segmental aneuploidy. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2017;34(8):975–81.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Treff NR, Franasiak JM. Detection of segmental aneuploidy and mosaicism in the human preimplantation embryo: technical considerations and limitations. Fertil Steril. 2017;107(1):27–31.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Dimitriadou E, Van der Aa N, Cheng J, Voet T, Vermeesch JR. Single cell segmental aneuploidy detection is compromised by S phase. Mol Cytogenet. 2014;11(7):46.

Article  Google Scholar 

Munné S, Spinella F, Grifo J, Zhang J, Beltran MP, Fragouli E, Fiorentino F. Clinical outcomes after the transfer of blastocysts characterized as mosaic by high resolution next generation sequencing- further insights. Eur J Med Genet. 2020;63:103741.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Zhang YX, Chen JJ, Nabu S, Yeung QSY, Li Y, Tan JH, Suksalak W, Chanchamroen S, Quangkananurug W, Wong PS, Chung JPW, Choy KW. The pregnancy outcome of mosaic embryo transfer: a prospective multicenter study and meta-Analysis. Genes (Basel). 2020;11(9):973.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Viotti M, Victor AR, Barnes FL, Zouves CG, Besser AG, Grifo JA, Cheng EH, Lee MS, Horcajadas JA, Corti L, Fiorentino F, Spinella F, Minasi MG, Greco E, Munné S. Using outcome data from one thousand mosaic embryo transfers to formulate an embryo ranking system for clinical use. Fertil Steril. 2021;115(5):1212–24.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Yang M, Rito T, Metzger J, Naftaly J, Soman R, Hu J, Albertini DF, Barad DH, Brivanlou AH, Gleicher N. Depletion of aneuploid cells in human embryos and gastruloids. Nat Cell Biol. 2021;23(4):314–21. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41556-021-00660-7. 

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Tiegs AW, Tao X, Zhan Y, Whitehead C, Kim J, Hanson B, Osman E, Kim TJ, Patounakis G, Gutmann J, Castelbaum A, Seli E, Jalas C, Scott RT Jr. A multicenter, prospective, blinded, nonselection study evaluating the predictive value of an aneuploid diagnosis using a targeted next-generation sequencing-based preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy assay and impact of biopsy. Fertil Steril. 2021;115(3):627–37.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Genome Data Viewer, National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gdv/browser/genome. Accessed 28 Sep 2024.

Levy B, Sigurjonsson S, Pettersen B, Maisenbacher MK, Hall MP, Demko Z, Lathi RB, Tao R, Aggarwal V, Rabinowitz M. Genomic imbalance in products of conception: single-nucleotide polymorphism chromosomal microarray analysis. Obstet Gynecol. 2014;124(2 Pt 1):202–9.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Marin D, Xu J, Treff NR. Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy: a review of published blastocyst reanalysis concordance data. Prenat Diagn. 2021;41(5):545–53.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Grkovic S, Traversa MV, Livingstone M, McArthur SJ. Clinical re-biopsy of segmental gains-the primary source of preimplantation genetic testing false positives. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2022;39(6):1313–22.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Bardos J, Kwal J, Caswell W, Jahandideh S, Stratton M, Tucker M, DeCherney A, Devine K, Hill M, O’Brien JE. Reproductive genetics laboratory may impact euploid blastocyst and live birth rates: a comparison of 4 national laboratories’ PGT-A results from vitrified donor oocytes. Fertil Steril. 2023;119(1):29–35.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar