Sleep is a crucial factor in recovery and must be integrated into athletes’ training plans for optimal performance and well-being. Although professional athletes are advised to sleep for at least 8 hours, many experience shorter sleep durations or poor sleep quality. Sleep interventions have been recently proposed to improve sleep, but their effects remain unclear. This ecological study aimed to evaluate the sleep of a rugby team and to assess the effects of sleep interventions, including sleep hygiene education and relaxation techniques. Thirty-six male professional rugby players were evaluated during two pre- and post-intervention match weeks using objective (actimetric) and subjective (questionnaires) assessments. At baseline, 34 on 36 athletes slept less than 8h per night. Combining both sleep dimensions, 61.1 % of players were considered poor sleepers. After sleep interventions, subjective sleep quality improved (p = 0.001, η2 = 0.22), and athletes went to bed earlier (23:28 ± 00:42 vs. 23:43 ± 00:45 during pre-intervention; p = 0.01, η2 = 0.15). Positive effects of sleep interventions were especially observed among poor sleepers as their objective sleep quantity increased (405.2 min pre-intervention vs. 425.9 min post-intervention p = 0.004, η2 = 0.28). Sleep interventions, composed of theoretical and practical sessions, improved sleep characteristics and might be implemented in athletes’ daily routine. This study offers a simple and accessible method to assess athletes’ sleep, while providing adapted recommendations to optimize or enhance sleep quality and quantity.

Key points

61.1% of the rugby players exhibited both poor sleep quality and quantity during the week and weekends.

Theoretical and practical sleep interventions elicited objective and subjective sleep improvement, especially among poor sleepers.

Sleep assessment and interventions represent an efficient, and feasible method among team-sport players for improving sleep quality.

The authors have declared no competing interest.

This study did not receive any funding

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

Ethical committee of Hospices Civil Lyon gave approval for this work (23-112).

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.

Yes

All data produced in the present study are available upon reasonable request to the authors