McGarry CK, O’Connell BF, Grattan MW, et al. Octavius 4D characterization for flattened and flattening filter free rotational deliveries. Med Phys. 2013;40(9): 091707. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.4817482. (PMID: 24007140).
Gayen S, Kombathula SH, Manna S, et al. Dosimetric comparison of coplanar and non-coplanar volumetric-modulated arc therapy in head and neck cancer treated with radiotherapy. Radiat Oncol J. 2020;38(2):138–47. https://doi.org/10.3857/roj.2020.00143. (PMID:33012157;PMCID:PMC7533406).
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Matar FS, Wilkinson D, Davis J, et al. Quality assurance of VMAT on flattened and flattening filter-free accelerators using a high spatial resolution detector. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2020;21(6):44–52. https://doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12864. (PMID:32277745;PMCID:PMC7324694).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Johnson JE, Beltran C, Wan Chan Tseung H, et al. Highly efficient and sensitive patient-specific quality assurance for spot-scanned proton therapy. PLoS ONE. 2019;14(2):e0212412. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0212412. (PMID: 30763390; PMCID: PMC6375645).
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Chandraraj V, Stathakis S, Manickam R, et al. Comparison of four commercial devices for RapidArc and sliding window IMRT QA. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2011;12(2):3367. https://doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v12i2.3367. (PMID:21587184;PMCID:PMC5718691).
Hussein M, Rowshanfarzad P, Ebert MA, et al. A comparison of the gamma index analysis in various commercial IMRT/VMAT QA systems. Radiother Oncol. 2013;109(3):370–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radonc.2013.08.048. (PMID: 24100148).
Isa Khan M, Shakil M, Tahir MB, et al. Selection of gamma analysis acceptance criteria in IMRT QA using Gafchromic EBT3 film dosimetry. J Radiother Pract. 2019;18(2):127–31. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1460396918000602.
Russo S, Bruschi A, Esposito M, et al. Evaluation of two detector arrays for VMAT pre-treatment quality assurance. Phys Medica. 2016;32:197. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejmp.2016.07.669.
Mynampati DK, Yaparpalvi R, Hong L, et al. Application of AAPM TG 119 to volumetric arc therapy (VMAT). J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2012;13(5):3382. https://doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v13i5.3382. (PMID:22955639;PMCID:PMC5718241).
Miften M, Olch A, Mihailidis D, et al. Tolerance limits and methodologies for IMRT measurement-based verification QA: recommendations of AAPM task group No 218. Med Phys. 2018;45(4):e53–83. https://doi.org/10.1002/mp.12810. (PMID: 29443390).
Tamborra P, Martinucci E, Massafra R, et al. The 3D isodose structure-based method for clinical dose distributions comparison in pretreatment patient-QA. Med Phys. 2019;46(2):426–36. https://doi.org/10.1002/mp.13297. (PMID: 30450559).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Pulliam KB, Followill D, Court L, et al. A six-year review of more than 13,000 patient-specific IMRT QA results from 13 different treatment sites. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2014;15(5):4935. https://doi.org/10.1120/jacmp.v15i5.4935. (PMID:25207581;PMCID:PMC4283460).
Van Esch A, Basta K, Evrard M, et al. The Octavius1500 2D ion chamber array and its associated phantoms: dosimetric characterization of a new prototype. Med Phys. 2014;41(9): 091708. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.4892178. (PMID: 25186383).
Yang B, Geng H, Ding Y, et al. Development of a novel methodology for QA of respiratory-gated and VMAT beam delivery using Octavius 4D phantom. Med Dosim. 2019;44(1):83–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meddos.2018.02.008. (PMID: 29602598).
Urso P, Lorusso R, Marzoli L, et al. Practical application of Octavius® -4D: characteristics and criticalities for IMRT and VMAT verification. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2018;19(5):517–24. https://doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12412. (Epub 2018 Jul 16PMID: 30009564; PMCID: PMC6123102).
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Low DA, Harms WB, Mutic S, et al. A technique for the quantitative evaluation of dose distributions. Med Phys. 1998;25(5):656–61. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.598248. (PMID: 9608475).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Low C, Toye W, Phung P, et al. Patient-specific quality assurance protocol for volumetric modulated arc therapy using dose volume histogram. J Med Phys. 2018;43(2):112–8. https://doi.org/10.4103/jmp.JMP_138_17. (PMID:29962689;PMCID:PMC6020622).
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Low DA, Dempsey JF. Evaluation of the gamma dose distribution comparison method. Med Phys. 2003;30(9):2455–64. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.1598711. (PMID: 14528967).
Low DA, Moran JM, Dempsey JF, et al. Dosimetry tools and techniques for IMRT. Med Phys. 2011;38(3):1313–38. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.3514120. (PMID: 21520843).
Alexandrian AN, Mavroidis P, Narayanasamy G, et al. Incorporating biological modeling into patient-specific plan verification. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2020;21(3):94–107. https://doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12831. (Epub 2020 Feb 26 PMID: 32101368; PMCID: PMC7075379).
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Stelljes TS, Harmeyer A, Reuter J, et al. Dosimetric characteristics of the novel 2D ionization chamber array OCTAVIUS Detector 1500. Med Phys. 2015;42(4):1528–37. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.4914151. (PMID: 25832043).
Article CAS PubMed Google Scholar
Allgaier B, Schüle E, Würfel J. Dose reconstruction in the OCTAVIUS 4D phantom and in the patient without using dose information from the TPS. PTW White Pap. 2013;913:0–7.
Pulliam KB, Huang JY, Howell RM, et al. Comparison of 2D and 3D gamma analyses. Med Phys. 2014;41(2): 021710. https://doi.org/10.1118/1.4860195. (PMID:24506601;PMCID:PMC3977814).
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Yu L, Kairn T, Trapp J, et al. Technical note: a modified gamma evaluation method for dose distribution comparisons. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2019;20(7):193–200. https://doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12606. (PMID:31282112;PMCID:PMC6612697).
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Rajasekaran D, Jeevanandam P, Sukumar P, et al. A study on correlation between 2D and 3D gamma evaluation metrics in patient-specific quality assurance for VMAT. Med Dosim. 2014;39(4):300–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.meddos.2014.05.002. (PMID: 24910246).
Aslian H, Severgnini M, Cupardo F, et al. EP-1562: VMAT pre-treatment verification using Octavius 4D system: from simple to more complex plans. Radiother Oncol. 2016;119:S724–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-8140(16)32812-2.
Das S, Kharade V, Pandey VP, et al. Gamma index analysis as a patient-specific quality assurance tool for high-precision radiotherapy: a clinical perspective of single institute experience. Cureus. 2022;14(10): e30885. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.30885. (PMID:36337776;PMCID:PMC9626372).
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Manna S, Singh BK, Das KJM. A comprehensive site-specific analysis of patient-specific quality assurance based on dose volume histogram of RapidArc treatment delivery. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother. 2024;29(6):675–89. https://doi.org/10.5603/rpor.103529. (PMID:40104666;PMCID:PMC11912890).
Deng J, Liu S, Huang Y, et al. Evaluating AAPM-TG-218 recommendations: Gamma index tolerance and action limits in IMRT and VMAT quality assurance using SunCHECK. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2024;25(6): e14277. https://doi.org/10.1002/acm2.14277. (PMID:38243604;PMCID:PMC11163510).
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Woon W, Ravindran PB, Ekayanake P, et al. A study on the effect of detector resolution on gamma index passing rate for VMAT and IMRT QA. J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2018;19(2):230–48. https://doi.org/10.1002/acm2.12285. (PMID:29460465;PMCID:PMC5849818).
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Xiao Q, Bai S, Li G, et al. Statistical process control and process capability analysis for non-normal volumetric modulated arc therapy patient-specific quality assurance processes. Med Phys. 2020;47(10):4694–702. https://doi.org/10.1002/mp.14399. (PMID: 32677053).
Comments (0)