Differences between laboratory scanner and intra-oral scanner regarding axes and distances of three implants in a curved line when using two types of intra-oral scan bodies: in vitro study

Rutkūnas V, Auškalnis L, Pletkus J. Intraoral scanners in implant prosthodontics. A narrative review. J Dent. 2024;148: 105152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2024.105152.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Afrashtehfar KI, Alnakeb NA, Assery MKM. Accuracy of intraoral scanners versus traditional impressions: a rapid umbrella review. J Evid Based Dent Pract. 2022;22(3):101719. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebdp.2022.101719.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Michelinakis G, Apostolakis D, Kamposiora P, Papavasiliou G, Özcan M. The direct digital workflow in fixed implant prosthodontics: a narrative review. BMC Oral Health. 2021;21(1):37. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-021-01398-2.

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Siqueira R, Galli M, Chen Z, Mendonça G, Meirelles L, Wang HL, Chan HL. Intraoral scanning reduces procedure time and improves patient comfort in fixed prosthodontics and implant dentistry: a systematic review. Clin Oral Investig. 2021;25(12):6517–31. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-021-04157-3.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Borbola D, Berkei G, Simon B, et al. In vitro comparison of five desktop scanners and an industrial scanner in the evaluation of an intraoral scanner accuracy. J Dent. 2023;129: 104391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2022.104391.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Donmez MB, Mathey A, Gäumann F, Mathey A, Yilmaz B, Abou-Ayash S. Scan accuracy and time efficiency of different implant-supported fixed partial denture situations depending on the intraoral scanner and scanned area: an in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent. 2024;131(6):1198–207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2023.01.029.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Donmez MB, Mathey A, Gäumann F, Mathey A, Yilmaz B, Abou-Ayash S. Effect of intraoral scanner and fixed partial denture situation on the scan accuracy of multiple implants: an in vitro study. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2023;25(3):502–10. https://doi.org/10.1111/cid.13190.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Abou-Ayash S, Mathey A, Gäumann F, Mathey A, Donmez MB, Yilmaz B. In vitro scan accuracy and time efficiency in various implant-supported fixed partial denture situations. J Dent. 2022;127:104358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2022.104358.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ben-Izhack G, Rosner O, Zenziper E, et al. Comparison between conventional and digital impressions for determining axes and distances of three implants in straight and curved lines: an in vitro study. J Clin Med. 2024;13(8):2352. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13082352.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Schmalzl J, Róth I, Borbély J, Hermann P, Vecsei B. The impact of software updates on accuracy of intraoral scanners. BMC Oral Health. 2023;23(1):219. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-023-02926-y.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Turkyilmaz I, Lakhia S, Tarrida LG, Varvara G. Guest commentary: the battle of file formats from intraoral optical scanners. Int J Prosthodont. 2020;33:369–71. https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.2020.4.gc.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Abad-Coronel C, Atria PJ, Romero Muñoz C, et al. Analysis of the mesh resolution of an STL exported from an intraoral scanner file. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2022;34(5):816–25. https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12889.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Mandelli F, Gherlone E, Gastaldi G, Ferrari M. Evaluation of the accuracy of extraoral laboratory scanners with a single-tooth abutment model: a 3D analysis. J Prosthodont Res. 2017;61(4):363–70.

PubMed  Google Scholar 

ISO 5725–1. Accuracy (trueness and precision) of measurement methods and results—part 1: general principles and definitions.

Natsubori R, Fukazawa S, Chiba T, Tanabe N, Kihara H, Kondo H. In vitro comparative analysis of scanning accuracy of intraoral and laboratory scanners in measuring the distance between multiple implants. Int J Implant Dent. 2022;8:18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40729-022-00416-4.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Lebon N, Tapie L, Duret F, Attal JP. Understanding dental CAD/CAM for restorations–accuracy from a mechanical engineering viewpoint. Int J Comput Dent. 2015;18:343–67.

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ben-Izhack G, Lugassy D, Rosner O, et al. Post sterilization of intraoral scan body and the effect it has on the axes and distances between three adjacent implants: in-vitro study. BMC Oral Health. 2024;24(1):870. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-024-04664-1.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Revilla-León M, Lanis A, Yilmaz B, Kois JC, Gallucci GO. Intraoral digital implant scans: parameters to improve accuracy. J Prosthodont. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.13749.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Michelinakis G, Apostolakis D, Nikolidakis D, Lapsanis G. Influence of different scan body design features and intraoral scanners on the congruence between scan body meshes and library files: an in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent. 2024;132(2):454.e1-454.e11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2024.05.016.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Arcuri L, Pozzi A, Lio F, Rompen E, Zechner W, Nardi A. Influence of implant scanbody material, position and operator on the accuracy of digital impression for complete-arch: a randomized in vitro trial. J Prosthodont Res. 2020;64:128–36.

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Fluegge T, Att W, Metzger M, Nelson K. A novel method to evaluate precision of optical implant impressions with commercial scan bodies—an experimental approach. J Prosthodont. 2017;26:34–41.

PubMed  Google Scholar 

Pachiou A, Zervou E, Tsirogiannis P, Sykaras N, Tortopidis D, Kourtis S. Characteristics of intraoral scan bodies and their influence on impression accuracy: a systematic review. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2023. https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.13074.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Roig E, Roig M, Garza LC, Costa S, Maia P, Espona J. Fit of complete-arch implant-supported prostheses produced from an intraoral scan by using an auxiliary device and from an elastomeric impression: a pilot clinical trial. J Prosthet Dent. 2022;128(3):404–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2020.10.024.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Mangano FG, Hauschild U, Veronesi G, Imburgia M, Mangano C, Admakin O. Trueness and precision of 5 intraoral scanners in the impressions of single and multiple implants: a comparative in vitro study. BMC Oral Health. 2019;19(1):101. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-019-0792-7.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Jivanescu A, Rotar P, Hategan S, Pricop C, Rus R, Goguta L. Clinical factors influence the trueness of intra-oral scanning. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent. 2019;27(1):51–5. https://doi.org/10.1922/EJPRD_01861Jivanescu05.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Jemt T. Failures and complications in 391 consecutively inserted fixed prostheses supported by Brånemark implants in edentulous jaws: a study of treatment from the time of prosthesis placement to the first annual checkup. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1991;6(3):270–6.

CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Cohen SR, Orenstein JH. The use of attachments in combination implant and natural-tooth fixed partial dentures: a technical report. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1994;9(2):230–4.

CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Brunski JB. Influence of biomechanical factors at the bone-biomaterial interface. Bone-Biomaterial Interface. 1991;2:391–403.

Google Scholar 

Brånemark P-I, Zarb GA, Albrektsson T. Tissue-integrated prostheses: osseointegration in clinical dentistry. Chicago: Quintessence; 1985. p. 99–115.

Google Scholar 

Klineberg IJ, Murray GM. Design of superstructures for osseointegrated fixtures. Swed Dent J Suppl. 1985;28:63–9.

CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Stimmelmayr M, Güth JF, Erdelt K, Edelhoff D, Beuer F. Digital evaluation of the reproducibility of implant scanbody fit–an in vitro study. Clin Oral Investig. 2012;16(3):851–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00784-011-0564-5.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Hogg WS, Zulauf K, Mehrhof J, Nelson K. The influence of torque tightening on the position stability of the abutment in conical implant-abutment connections. Int J Prosthodont. 2015;28(5):538–41. https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.3853.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Nedelcu R, Olsson P, Thulin M, Nyström I, Thor A. In vivo trueness and precision of full-arch implant scans using intraoral scanners with three different acquisition protocols. J Dent. 2023;128: 104308. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdent.2022.104308.

Article  CAS 

Comments (0)

No login
gif