Understanding preferences for self-sampling in a national cervical screening programme: a protocol for a discrete choice experiment

ABSTRACT

Introduction The NHS cervical screening programme (NHSCSP) currently involves a healthcare professional collecting a cervical sample in a healthcare setting. This method of screening has barriers associated with access to screening appointments, and the poor acceptability of the speculum examination. Primary screening through HPV testing has led to the development of self-sampling screening methods including vaginal and urine self-sampling, with many UK studies comparing these screening methods with the current NHSCSP. It is not known what features of self-sampling influence individual’s preferences and cervical screening uptake. To understand these preferences, we plan to undertake a discrete choice experiment (DCE). This protocol aims to describe the steps taken to design the DCE and the proposed approach to fielding the DCE to identify preferences for different sampling approaches in cervical screening.

Methods and analysis An online survey comprising a DCE was designed to understand preferences of individuals for self-sampling methods within the NHSCSP. Attributes and levels for the DCE were generated through an iterative process including a literature review of qualitative studies about self-sampling cervical screening methods, input from cervical screening clinical experts and a patient and public involvement group (n=6). A D-efficient design was used to create choice sets for the DCE survey. Regression based analysis will be used to estimate the impact of each attribute and level on individual choices.

Ethics and dissemination This study has been approved by The University of Manchester Proportionate Research Ethics Committee (2024-20767-37669). The results of the DCE will be submitted for publication in a relevant peer review journal and the results will be presented at national and international conferences.

STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS OF THIS STUDY

To our knowledge, this study will be the first to quantify stated preferences for self-sampling methods within a CSP focusing on all individuals who are eligible for screening in the UK.

The attributes and levels will be selected based on previous qualitative work as well as from multiple discussions with relevant stakeholders, including clinicians and public contributors.

The results will contribute towards understanding what aspects of self-sampling methods within a CSP are important for the target population.

Since the survey will only be available online, there is a potential to miss individuals without technological access and literacy.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

This work was supported by an early career award for Dr Stuart Wright from the Wellcome Trust (226922/Z/23/Z). Stuart Wright, Emma Crosbie (NIHR300650), and Katherine Payne are supported by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Manchester Biomedical Research Centre (BRC) (NIHR203308). Jennifer Davies is funded by a CRUK Clinical Research Fellowship awarded through the Manchester Cancer Research Centre (C19941/A28707).

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.

Yes

Footnotes

Funding This work was supported by an early career award for Dr Stuart Wright from the Wellcome Trust (226922/Z/23/Z). Stuart Wright, Emma Crosbie (NIHR300650), and Katherine Payne are supported by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Manchester Biomedical Research Centre (BRC) (NIHR203308). Jennifer Davies is funded by a CRUK Clinical Research Fellowship awarded through the Manchester Cancer Research Centre (C19941/A28707).

Data Availability

There is no data associated with this article

Comments (0)

No login
gif