Alexander, J., & Smith, P. (2001). The strong program in cultural theory: elements of a structural hermeneutics. In J. H. Turner (Ed.), Handbook of sociological theory (pp. 135–150). Springer US.

Google Scholar 

Bacchi, C. (2009). Analysing policy: What’s the problem represented to be? Pearson.

Google Scholar 

Bartels, K., & Turnbull, N. (2020). Relational public administration: A synthesis and heuristic classification of relational approaches. Public Management Review, 22(9), 1324–1346.

Article  Google Scholar 

Beck, U. (1986). Risikogesellschaft. Aufdem Weg in eine andere Moderne. Suhrkamp.

Google Scholar 

Boswell, J., & Corbett, J. (2015). Embracing impressionism: Revealing the brush strokes of interpretive research. Critical Policy Studies, 9(2), 216–225.

Article  Google Scholar 

Butler, J. (1990). Gender trouble: Feminism and the subversion of identity. Routledge.

Google Scholar 

Curato, N., Dryzek, J. S., Ercan, S. A., Hendriks, C. M., & Niemeyer, S. (2017). Twelve key findings in deliberative democracy research. Daedalus, 146(3), 28–38.

Article  Google Scholar 

de Freitas Boullosa, R., Paul, R., & Smith-Carrier, T. (2024). Fifteen years of critical policy studies: Achievements, challenges, and the tensions of growth. Critical Policy Studies, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1080/19460171.2024.2307423

Dodge, J. (2015). Indication and inference: reflections on the challenge of mixing paradigms in the Narrative Policy Framework. Critical Policy Studies, 9(3), 361–367. https://doi.org/10.1080/19460171.2015.1075735

Durnová, A. (2015). Lost in translation: Expressing emotions in policy deliberation. In F. Fischer, D. Torgerson, A. Durnová, & M. Orsini (Eds.), Handbook of critical policy studies (pp. 222–235). Edward Elgar.

Google Scholar 

Durnová, A. (2018). Understanding emotions in policy studies through Foucault and Deleuze. Politics and Governance, 6(4), 95–102. https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v6i4.1528

Article  Google Scholar 

Durnová, A. (2022). Making interpretive policy analysis critical and societally relevant: Emotions, ethnography and language. Policy & Politics, 50(1), 43–58. https://doi.org/10.1332/030557321x16129850569011. https://bristoluniversitypressdigital.com/view/journals/pp/50/1/article-p43.xml

Article  Google Scholar 

Durnová, A. P., & Weible, C. M. (2020). Tempest in a teapot? Toward new collaborations between mainstream policy process studies and interpretive policy studies. Policy Sciences, 53(3), 571–588. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-020-09387-y

Article  Google Scholar 

Durnová, A., & Zittoun, P. (2011). Interpretive policy analysis in a French setting. The fifth interpretive policy analysis conference, Grenoble, June 2010. Critical Policy Studies, 5(2), 103–105.

Article  Google Scholar 

Ercan, S. A., Durnová, A., Loeber, A., & Wagenaar, H. (2020). Symposium: Revisiting the three pillars of deliberative policy analysis. Policy Studies, 41(4), 307–330. https://doi.org/10.1080/01442872.2020.1774147

Article  Google Scholar 

Fischer, F. (1998). Beyond empiricism: Policy inquiry in post positivist perspective. Policy Studies Journal, 26(1), 129–146.

Article  Google Scholar 

Fischer, F., & Forester, J. (1993). In F. Fischer & J. Forester (Eds.), The argumentative turn in policy analysis and planning. UCL Press.

Google Scholar 

Fischer, F., & Gottweis, H. (2012). The argumentative turn revisited: Public policy as communicative practice. Duke University Press.

Book  Google Scholar 

Fischer, F., Torgerson, D., Durnová, A., & Orsini, M. (Eds.). (2015). Handbook of critical policy studies. Edward Elgar Publishing.

Google Scholar 

Fishkin, J. S., & Mansbridge, J. J. (2017). The prospects & limits of deliberative democracy. American Academy of Arts and Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1162/DAED_x_0042

Foucault, M. (1969). L’archéologie du savoir. Bibliothèque des sciences humaines. Gallimard.

Google Scholar 

Foucault, M. (1997). “Il faut défendre la société” cours au Collège de France, 1975–1976. Edited by dans le cadre de l’Association pour le Centre Michel Foucault éd. établie, sous la dir. de François Ewald et Alessandro Fontana, par Mauro Bertani et Alessandro Fontana. Hautes études. Gallimard Le Seuil.

Google Scholar 

Fullerton, A. H., Gabehart, K. M., Yordy, J., & Weible, C. M. (2023). Analysing emotional discourse among allies and opponents in the news media. Emotions and Society, 5(3), 296–314.

Article  Google Scholar 

Geertz, C. (1973). The interpretation of cultures. Basic books.

Google Scholar 

Glynos, J., & Howarth, D. J. (2007). Logics of critical explanation in social and political theory. Transferred to digital print. Ed. Vol. Jason Glynos and David Howarth. Routledge innovations in political theory. Routledge.

Google Scholar 

Goffman, E. (1969). The presentation of self in everyday life. (USA anchor books 1959) Penguin books.

Google Scholar 

Griggs, S., & Howarth, D. (2004). A transformative political campaign? The new rhetoric of protest against airport expansion in the UK. Journal of Political Ideologies, 9(2), 181–201.

Article  Google Scholar 

Habermas, J. (1990). Strukturwandel der Öffentlichkeit. Untersuchungen zu einer Kategorie der bürgerlichen Gesellschaft (5th ed.). Suhrkamp.

Google Scholar 

Hajer, M. (1993). Discourse coalitions and the institutionalization of practice: The case of acid rain in Great Britain. In F. Fischer & J. Forester (Eds.), The argumentative turn in policy analysis and planning (pp. 43–67). Duke University Press.

Chapter  Google Scholar 

Hajer, M. A. (2005a). Rebuilding ground zero. The politics of performance. Planning Theory & Practice, 6(4), 445–464.

Article  Google Scholar 

Hajer, M. A. (2005b). Setting the stage:A dramaturgy of policy deliberation. Administration & Society, 36(6), 624–647. https://doi.org/10.1177/0095399704270586. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0095399704270586

Article  Google Scholar 

Hajer, M., & Wagenaar, H. (Eds.). (2003). Deliberative policy analysis: Understanding governance in the network society. Cambridge University Press.

Google Scholar 

Hawkesworth, M. (1994). Policy studies within a feminist frame. Policy Sciences, 27(2), 97–118. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00999883

Article  Google Scholar 

Howarth, D. (2010). Power, discourse, and policy: Articulating a hegemony approach to critical policy studies. Critical Policy Studies, 3(3–4), 309–335. https://doi.org/10.1080/19460171003619725

Article  Google Scholar 

Howarth, D., & Griggs, S. (2015). Poststructuralist discourse theory and critical policy studies: Interests, identities and policy change. In Handbook of critical policy studies (p. 111). Edward Elgar Publishing.

Google Scholar 

Jones, M. D., & Radaelli, C. M. (2015). The narrative policy framework: Child or monster? Critical Policy Studies, 9(3), 339–355. https://doi.org/10.1080/19460171.2015.1053959

Article  Google Scholar 

Kilty, J. M., & Orsini, M. (2024). Emotions and anti-carceral advocacy in Canada: ‘All of the anger this creates in our bodies is also a tool to kill us’. Policy & Politics, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1332/03055736y2023d000000024. https://bristoluniversitypressdigital.com/view/journals/pp/aop/article-10.1332-03055736Y2023D000000024/article-10.1332-03055736Y2023D000000024.xml

Laclau, E. (1996). Emancipation(s). Verso.

Google Scholar 

Lasswell, H. D. (1971). A pre-view of policy sciences. American Elsevier.

Google Scholar 

Latour, B. (2012). We have never been modern. Harvard University Press.

Google Scholar 

Lejano, R. P., & Leong, C. (2012). A hermeneutic approach to explaining and understanding public controversies. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 22(4), 793–814.

Article  Google Scholar 

Li, Y. (2019). Deliberative policy analysis: Towards a methodological orientation. Policy Studies, 40(5), 437–455. https://doi.org/10.1080/01442872.2019.1618812

Article  Google Scholar 

Lövbrand, E., & Stripple, J. (2015). Foucault and critical policy studies. In F. Fischer, D. Torgerson, A. Durnová, & M. Orsini (Eds.), Handbook of critical policy studies (pp. 92–114). Edward Elgar.

Google Scholar 

Luke, T. W. (2015). The interpretation of power. In F. Fischer, D. Torgerson, A. Durnová, & M. Orsini (Eds.), Handbook of critical policy studies (pp. 151–169). Edward Elgar.

Google Scholar 

Majone, G. (1989). Evidence, argument and persuasion in the policy process. Yale University Press.

Google Scholar 

Orsini, M. (2021). Feeling critical: Navigating the emotional worlds of COVID-19. Critical Policy Studies, 15(3), 387–397. https://doi.org/10.1080/19460171.2021.1963793

Article  Google Scholar 

Paterson, S. (2010). Feminizing obstetrics or medicalizing midwifery? The discursive constitution of midwifery in Ontario, Canada. Critical Policy Studies, 4(2), 127–145.

Article  Google Scholar 

Paterson, S., & Scala, F. (2015). Making gender visible: Exploring feminist perspectives through the case of anti-smoking policy. In Handbook of critical policy studies (pp. 481–506). Edward Elgar Publishing.

Google Scholar 

Rahman, K., & Kazmi, S. (2023). Radical critical policy studies: Situating racialized personhood within decolonizing policy, knowledge production, self-reflexivity & positionality/social-location. Critical Policy Studies, 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/19460171.2023.2204530

Sabatier, P. A., & Weible, C. M. (2007). The advocacy coalition framework. Theories of the policy process, 2, 189–220.

Google Scholar 

Saretzki, T. (2015). Habermas, critical theory and public policy. In F. Fischer, D. Torgerson, A. Durnová, & M. Orsini (Eds.), Handbook of critical policy studies (pp. 67–91). Edward Elgar.

Google Scholar 

Schubert, K., & Bandelow, N. C. (2014). Politikdimensionen und Fragestellungen der Politikfeldanalyse. In Lehrbuch der Politikfeldanalyse (3rd ed., pp. 3–24). De Gruyter Oldenbourg.

Chapter  Google Scholar 

Sorenson, E., & Torfing, J. (2007). Theoretical approaches to governance network dynamics. In E. Sorenson & J. Torfing (Eds.), Theories of democratic network governance (pp. 25–42). Plagrave Macmillian.

Chapter  Google Scholar 

Torfing, J. (2007). Introduction: Democratic network governance. In M. Marcussen & J. Torfing (Eds.), Democratic network governance in Europe (pp. 1–22). Palgrave Macmillian.

Google Scholar 

Verhoeven, I., & Metze, T. (2022). Heated policy: Policy actors’ emotional storylines and conflict escalation. Policy Sciences, 55(2), 223–237. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-022-09459-1

Article  Google Scholar 

Yanow, D. (1996). How does a policy mean? Interpreting policy and organizational actions. Georgetown University Press.

Google Scholar 

Yanow, D. (1999). Conducting interpretive policy analysis. Vol. 47. Qualitative research methods. Sage.

Google Scholar 

Yanow, D., & Schwartz-Shea, P. (2015). Interpretation and method: Empirical research methods and the interpretive turn. Routledge.