Is flexible navigable suction ureteral access sheath (FANS) safer and more efficient than conventional sheaths? Italian multicentric experience

Sorokin I, Mamoulakis C, Miyazawa K, Rodgers A, Talati J, Lotan Y (2017) Epidemiology of stone disease across the world. World J Urol 35:1301–1320. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-017-2008-6

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Romero V, Akpinar H, Assimos DG (2010) Kidney stones: a global picture of prevalence, incidence, and associated risk factors. Rev Urol 12:e86–e96

PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

European Association of Urology (EAU) guidelines - https://uroweb.org/guidelines n.d

Raynal G, Malval B, Panthier F, Roustan F-R, Traxer O, Meria P et al (2023) 2022 Recommendations of the AFU lithiasis committee: ureteroscopy and ureterorenoscopy. Prog Urol 33:843–853. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.purol.2023.08.016

Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Zeng G, Zhao Z, Mazzon G, Pearle M, Choong S, Skolarikos A et al (2022) European Association of Urology section of urolithiasis and international alliance of urolithiasis joint consensus on retrograde intrarenal surgery for the management of renal stones. Eur Urol Focus 8:1461–1468. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euf.2021.10.011

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Tsaturyan A, Kalogeropoulos G, Lattarulo M, Adamou C, Pagonis K, Peteinaris A et al (2022) The use of 14/16Fr ureter access sheath for safe and effective management of large upper ureteral calculi. World J Urol 40:1217–1222. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-022-03949-w

Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Lima A, Reeves T, Geraghty R, Pietropaolo A, Whitehurst L, Somani BK (2020) Impact of ureteral access sheath on renal stone treatment: prospective comparative non-randomised outcomes over a 7-year period. World J Urol 38:1329–1333. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-019-02878-5

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Traxer O, Wendt-Nordahl G, Sodha H, Rassweiler J, Meretyk S, Tefekli A et al (2015) Differences in renal stone treatment and outcomes for patients treated either with or without the support of a ureteral access sheath: The clinical research office of the endourological society ureteroscopy Global Study. World J Urol 33:2137–2144. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-015-1582-8

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Huang J, Xie D, Xiong R, Deng X, Huang C, Fan D et al (2018) The application of suctioning flexible ureteroscopy with intelligent pressure control in treating upper urinary tract calculi on patients with a solitary kidney. Urology 111:44–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urology.2017.07.042

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Zeng G, Wang D, Zhang T, Wan SP (2016) Modified access sheath for continuous flow ureteroscopic lithotripsy: a preliminary report of a novel concept and technique. J Endourol 30:992–996. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2016.0411

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Fayad MK, Fahmy O, Abulazayem KM, Salama NM (2022) Retrograde intrarenal surgery versus percutaneous nephrolithotomy for treatment of renal pelvic stone more than 2 centimeters: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Urolithiasis 50:113–117. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00240-021-01289-9

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Clavien PA, Barkun J, De Oliveira ML, Vauthey JN, Dindo D, Schulick RD et al (2009) The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg 250:187–196. https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181b13ca2

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Chang X, Wang Y, Li J, Han Z (2021) Prestenting versus nonprestenting on the outcomes of flexible ureteroscopy for large upper urinary stones: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Urol Int 105:560–567. https://doi.org/10.1159/000506652

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Patel RM, Jefferson FA, Owyong M, Hofmann M, Ayad ML, Osann K et al (2021) Characterization of intracalyceal pressure during ureteroscopy. World J Urol 39:883–889. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-020-03259-z

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Lua A, Tan LRL, Panthier F, Sierra A, Ventimiglia E, Solano C et al (2024) Optimal deflection techniques for flexible and navigable suction ureteral access sheaths (FANS): a comparative in vitro PEARLS analysis. World J Urol 42:606. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-024-05297-3

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Hu H, Qin M, Yang L, Hu H, Qin G, Qiu M et al (2024) Analysis of the effectiveness and safety of 7.5 Fr ultra-thin flexible ureteroscope combined with a tip-flexible suctioning ureteral access sheath for the treatment of kidney stones. Int Urol Nephrol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11255-024-04269-1

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Chen W, Lu K, Liu C, Weng J, Gao R (2024) A feasibility study on the efficacy and safety of a novel tip-flexible suction ureteral access sheath combined with flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy for treating kidney stones ≥30 mm. J Endourol. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2024.0283

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Nicklas AP, Schilling D, Bader MJ, Herrmann TRW, Nagele U, Training and Research in Urological Surgery and Technology (T.R.U.S.T.)-Group (2015) The vacuum cleaner effect in minimally invasive percutaneous nephrolitholapaxy. World J Urol 33:1847–1853. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-015-1541-4

Zhu Z, Cui Y, Zeng F, Li Y, Chen Z, Hequn C (2019) Comparison of suctioning and traditional ureteral access sheath during flexible ureteroscopy in the treatment of renal stones. World J Urol 37:921–929. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-018-2455-8

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Prata F, Cacciatore L, Salerno A, Tedesco F, Ragusa A, Basile S et al (2024) Urinary tract infection predictors in patients undergoing retrograde intrarenal surgery for renal stones: does the instrument make the difference? J Clin Med 13:2758. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13102758

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

Gauhar V, Chew BH, Traxer O, Tailly T, Emiliani E, Inoue T et al (2023) Indications, preferences, global practice patterns and outcomes in retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) for renal stones in adults: results from a multicenter database of 6669 patients of the global FLEXible ureteroscopy Outcomes Registry (FLEXOR). World J Urol 41:567–574. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-022-04257-z

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Erkoc M, Bozkurt M, Sezgin MA, Ozcan L, Can O, Danis E et al (2024) Efficacy of aspiration-assisted ureteral access sheath (ClearPETRA) in retrograde intrarenal surgery. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 34:420–424. https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2024.0076

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Zhang Z, Xie T, Li F, Wang X, Liu F, Jiang B et al (2023) Comparison of traditional and novel tip-flexible suctioning ureteral access sheath combined with flexible ureteroscope to treat unilateral renal calculi. World J Urol 41:3619–3627. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-023-04648-w

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Gauhar V, Traxer O, Castellani D, Sietz C, Chew BH, Fong KY et al (2024) Could use of a flexible and navigable suction ureteral access sheath be a potential game-changer in retrograde intrarenal surgery? Outcomes at 30 days from a large, prospective, multicenter, Real-world Study by the European Association of Urology Urolithiasis Section. Eur Urol Focus S2405–4569(24):00073–00077. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euf.2024.05.010

Article  Google Scholar 

Brain E, Geraghty RM, Lovegrove CE, Yang B, Somani BK (2021) Natural history of post-treatment kidney stone fragments: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Urol 206:526–538. https://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000001836

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Yuen SKK, Traxer O, Wroclawski ML, Gadzhiev N, Chai CA, Lim EJ et al (2024) Scoping review of experimental and clinical evidence and its influence on development of the suction ureteral access sheath. Diagnostics (Basel) 14:1034. https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics14101034

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Gauhar V, Traxer O, Castellani D, Fong KY, Binamri S, Gökce MI et al (2024) Operative outcomes 24 hours after retrograde intrarenal surgery for solitary renal calculi using a flexible and navigable suction ureteral access sheath. A prospective global multicenter study by the European Association of Urology Section on Urolithiasis. Minerva Urol Nephrol 76:625–634. https://doi.org/10.23736/S2724-6051.24.05961-5

Comments (0)

No login
gif