de Kunder SL, van Kuijk SMJ, Rijkers K, Caelers IJMH, van Hemert WLW, de Bie RA et al (2017) Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) versus posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) in lumbar spondylolisthesis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Spine J 17:1712–1721. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2017.06.018
Yamada K, Toyoda H, Hyakumachi T, Abe Y, Takahashi S, Suzuki A et al (2023) Less-invasive decompression procedures can reduce risk of reoperation for lumbar spinal stenosis with diffuse idiopathic skeletal hyperostosis extended to the lumbar segment: analysis of two retrospective cohorts. Eur Spine J 32:505–516. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-022-07496-1
Hara S, Andresen H, Solheim O, Carlsen SM, Sundstrøm T, Lønne G et al (2022) Effect of spinal cord burst stimulation vs placebo stimulation on disability in patients with chronic radicular pain after lumbar spine surgery: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 328:1506–1514. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2022.18231
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Xu W, Ran B, Zhao J, Luo W, Gu R (2022) Risk factors for failed back surgery syndrome following open posterior lumbar surgery for degenerative lumbar disease. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 23:1141. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-022-06066-2
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Gilbert F, Heintel TM, Jakubietz MG, Köstler H, Sebald C, Meffert RH et al (2018) Quantitative MRI comparison of multifidus muscle degeneration in thoracolumbar fractures treated with open and minimally invasive approach. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 19:75. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-018-2001-2
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Fu CJ, Chen WC, Lu ML, Cheng CH, Niu CC (2020) Comparison of paraspinal muscle degeneration and decompression effect between conventional open and minimal invasive approaches for posterior lumbar spine surgery. Sci Rep 10:14635. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-71515-8
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Momin AA, Steinmetz MP (2020) Evolution of minimally invasive lumbar spine surgery. World Neurosurg 140:622–626. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wneu.2020.05.071
Lv Y, Chen M, Wang SL, Qin RJ, Ma C, Ding QR et al (2022) Endo-TLIF versus MIS-TLIF in 1-segment lumbar spondylolisthesis: a prospective randomized pilot study. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 212:107082. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clineuro.2021.107082
Cheng X, Zhang K, Sun X, Zhao C, Li H, Ni B et al (2017) Clinical and radiographic outcomes of bilateral decompression via a unilateral approach with transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis with stenosis. Spine J 17:1127–1133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spinee.2017.04.011
Liu G, Hu L, Shen F, Hu Y, Ma W (2023) Clinical outcomes of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion using a modified posterior spinous process-splitting approach for lumbar degenerative or isthmic spondylolisthesis: a prospective cohort study. J Neurosurg Spine 19:1–7. https://doi.org/10.3171/2023.4.SPINE2322
Liu G, Zhao J, Yuan L, Shi F, Zhang L (2023) Spinal anesthesia for L5-S1 interlaminar endoscopic lumbar discectomy: a retrospective study. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 24:818. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-023-06956-z
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Fukui M, Chiba K, Kawakami M, Kikuchi S, Konno S, Miyamoto M et al (2007) JOA Back Pain evaluation questionnaire: initial report. J Orthop Sci 12:443–450. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00776-007-1162-x
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Fukui M, Chiba K, Kawakami M, Kikuchi S, Konno S, Miyamoto M et al (2007) Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain evaluation questionnaire. Part 2. Verification of its reliability. J Orthop Sci 12:526–532. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00776-007-1168-4
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Fukui M, Chiba K, Kawakami M, Kikuchi S, Konno S, Miyamoto M et al (2008) Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain evaluation questionnaire (JOABPEQ). Part 3. Validity study and establishment of the measurement scale. J Orthop Sci 13:173–179. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00776-008-1213-y
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Ledesma JA, Ottaway JC, Lambrechts MJ, Dees A, Thomas TL, Kurd MF et al (2023) Early experience with uniplanar versus biplanar expandable interbody fusion devices in single-level minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion. Neurospine 20:487–497. https://doi.org/10.14245/ns.2244870.435
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Hallett A, Huntley JS, Gibson JN (2007) Foraminal stenosis and single-level degenerative disc disease: a randomized controlled trial comparing decompression with decom pression and instrumented fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 32:1375–1380. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e318064520f
Watanabe K, Hosoya T, Shiraishi T (2003) Spinous process splitting laminectomy preserving posterior musculopligamentous complex for lumbar spinal canal stenosis. Rinsho Seikei Geka 38:1401–1408
Chatani K (2016) A novel surgical approach to the lumbar spine involving hemilateral split-off of the spinous process to preserve the multifidus muscle: technical note. J Neurosurg Spine 24:694–699. https://doi.org/10.3171/2015.5.SPINE141074
Liu G, Zou X, Dong Y, Alhaskawi A, Hu L, Mao L et al (2023) Unilateral transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion through a modified hemilateral spinous process-splitting approach. Front Neurol 14:1274384. https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2023.1274384
Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Watanabe K, Matsumoto M, Ikegami T, Nishiwaki Y, Tsuji T, Ishii K et al (2011) Reduced postoperative wound pain after lumbar spinous process-splitting laminectomy for lumbar canal stenosis: a randomized controlled study. J Neurosurg Spine 14:51–58. https://doi.org/10.3171/2010.9.SPINE09933
Kim KT, Suk KS, Sang-Hun Lee SH, Jung-Hee Lee JH, Park KJ, Son ES et al (2011) Comparative study of the clinical outcomes of unilateral transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) with bilateral TLIF using wiltse approach and conventional approach. J Korean Soc Spine Surg 18:208–216
Liu L, Xue H, Han Z, Jiang L, Chen L, Wang D (2023) Comparison between OLIF and MISTLIF in degenerative lumbar stenosis: an age-, sex-, and segment-matched cohort study. Sci Rep 13:13188. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-40533-7
Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar
Hu ZJ, Fang XQ, Zhou ZJ, Wang JY, Zhao FD, Fan SW (2013) Effect and possible mechanism of muscle-splitting approach on multifidus muscle injury and atrophy after posterior lumbar spine surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am 95(e1921–9). https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.L.01607
Mori E, Okada S, Ueta T, Itaru Y, Maeda T, Kawano O et al (2012)spinous process-splitting open pedicle screw fusion provides favorable results in patients with low back discomfort and pain compared to conventional open pedicle screw fixation over 1 year after surgery. Eur Spine J 21:745–753. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-011-2146-2
Kawakami M, Nakao S, Fukui D, Kadosaka Y, Matsuoka T, Yamada H (2013) Modified Marmot operation versus spinous process transverse cutting laminectomy for lumbar spinal stenosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 38:E1461–E1468. https://doi.org/10.1097/BRS.0b013e31829ff4ae
Uehara M, Takahashi J, Ikegami S, Tokida R, Nishimura H, Sakai N et al (2021) Values for the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain evaluation questionnaire in the general elderly population: a Japanese cohort survey randomly sampled from a basic resident registry. J Orthop Sci 26:774–778. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jos.2020.08.010
Comments (0)