Mate K, Nedjim S, Bellucci S, Boucault C, Ghaffar N, Constantini T et al (2023) Prostate biopsy approach and complication rates. Oncol Lett 26(3):375. https://doi.org/10.3892/ol.2023.13959

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Petov V, Bazarkin A, Morozov A, Taratkin M, Ganzha T, Danilov S et al (2023) A prospective comparison of transrectal standard, cognitive, transperineal fusion, and mapping prostate biopsy for cancer detection. J Endourol 37(8):940–947. https://doi.org/10.1089/end.2022.0780

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Hu JP, Hong YY, Wang MZ, Zeng J, Liu WP (2023) The changes in gleason score between the diagnostic biopsy and radical prostatectomy pathology. Indian J Surg. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12262-023-03882-1

Article  Google Scholar 

Jeong H, Choo MS, Cho MC, Son H, Yoo S (2022) Prediction of surgical margin status and location after radical prostatectomy using positive biopsy sites on 12-core standard prostate biopsy. Sci Rep 12(1):4066. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-08022-5

Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Hu JP, Yu Y, Liu W, Peng ZX, Guo J, Xi HB (2022) A Nomogram predicting lymph node metastasis in patients with prostate cancer undergoing ultrasound-guided transrectal prostate biopsy. Indian J Surg 84(6):1217–1224. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12262-021-03211-4

Article  Google Scholar 

Briganti A, Chun FK, Salonia A, Zanni G, Scattoni V, Valiquette L et al (2006) Validation of a nomogram predicting the probability of lymph node invasion among patients undergoing radical prostatectomy and an extended pelvic lymphadenectomy. Eur Urol 49(6):1019–1026 (discussion 26-7)

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Acar C, Kleinjan GH, van den Berg NS, Wit EM, van Leeuwen FW, van der Poel HG (2015) Advances in sentinel node dissection in prostate cancer from a technical perspective. Int J Urol Off J Jpn Urol Assoc 22(10):898–909. https://doi.org/10.1111/iju.12863

Article  Google Scholar 

Wit EMK, van Beurden F, Kleinjan GH, Grivas N, de Korne CM, Buckle T et al (2022) The impact of drainage pathways on the detection of nodal metastases in prostate cancer: a phase II randomized comparison of intratumoral vs intraprostatic tracer injection for sentinel node detection. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 49(5):1743–1753. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-021-05580-0

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Tosco L, Devos G, De Coster G, Roumeguere T, Everaerts W, Quackels T et al (2020) Development and external validation of a nomogram to predict lymph node invasion after robot assisted radical prostatectomy. Urol Oncol 38(2):37.e11-37.e20

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Buckle T, Brouwer OR, Valdés Olmos RA, van der Poel HG, van Leeuwen FW (2012) Relationship between intraprostatic tracer deposits and sentinel lymph node mapping in prostate cancer patients. J Nucl Medi Off Publ Soc Nucl Med 53(7):1026–1033. https://doi.org/10.2967/jnumed.111.098517

Article  Google Scholar 

Lestingi JFP, Guglielmetti GB, Trinh QD, Coelho RF, Pontes J Jr, Bastos DA et al (2021) Extended versus limited pelvic lymph node dissection during radical prostatectomy for intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer: early oncological outcomes from a randomized phase 3 trial. Eur Urol 79(5):595–604. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2020.11.040

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Fiori C, Checcucci E, Stura I, Amparore D, De Cillis S, Piana A et al (2023) Development of a novel nomogram to identify the candidate to extended pelvic lymph node dissection in patients who underwent mpMRI and target biopsy only. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 26(2):388–394. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41391-022-00565-y

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Wang H, Xia Z, Xu Y, Sun J, Wu J (2023) The predictive value of machine learning and nomograms for lymph node metastasis of prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis 26(3):602–613. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41391-023-00704-z

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Briganti A, Larcher A, Abdollah F, Capitanio U, Gallina A, Suardi N et al (2012) Updated nomogram predicting lymph node invasion in patients with prostate cancer undergoing extended pelvic lymph node dissection: the essential importance of percentage of positive cores. Eur Urol 61(3):480–487. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2011.10.044

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Martini A, Wever L, Soeterik TFW, Rakauskas A, Fankhauser CD, Grogg JB et al (2023) Unilateral pelvic lymph node dissection in prostate cancer patients diagnosed in the era of magnetic resonance imaging-targeted biopsy: a study that challenges the dogma. J Urol 210(1):117–127. https://doi.org/10.1097/ju.0000000000003442

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Suzuki T, Kurokawa K, Yamanaka H, Jimbo H (1992) Lymphatic drainage of the prostate gland in canines. Prostate 21(4):279–286. https://doi.org/10.1002/pros.2990210404

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Brössner C, Ringhofer H, Hernady T, Kuber W, Madersbacher S, Pycha A (2001) Lymphatic drainage of prostatic transition and peripheral zones visualized on a three-dimensional workstation. Urology 57(2):389–393. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0090-4295(00)00921-3

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Gandaglia G, Barletta F, Robesti D, Scuderi S, Rajwa P, Gomez Rivas J et al (2023) Identification of the optimal candidates for nodal staging with extended pelvic lymph node dissection among prostate cancer patients who underwent preoperative prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography. external validation of the memorial sloan kettering cancer center and briganti nomograms and development of a novel tool. Eur Urol Oncol. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euo.2023.05.003

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Gigliarano C, Nonis A, Briganti A, Bonetti M, Serio CD (2018) Effect of the number of removed lymph nodes on prostate cancer recurrence and survival: evidence from an observational study. BMC Bioinformatics 19(Suppl 7):200. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12859-018-2180-8

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Hu J, Yu Y, Liu W, Zhong J, Zhou X, Xi H (2022) The survival benefit of different lymph node yields in radical prostatectomy for pN1M0 prostate cancer patients: Implications from a population-based study. Front Oncol 12:953069. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2022.953069

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Carlsson S, Bottai M, Lantz A, Bjartell A, Hugosson J, Steineck G et al (2022) Lymph swelling after radical prostatectomy and pelvic lymph node dissection. BJU Int 129(6):695–698. https://doi.org/10.1111/bju.15702

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Blas L, Shiota M, Nagakawa S, Tsukahara S, Matsumoto T, Monji K et al (2022) Validation of models predicting lymph node involvement probability in patients with prostate cancer. Int J Urol Off J Jpn Urol Assoc 29(5):428–434. https://doi.org/10.1111/iju.14802

Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Lu M, Luo Y, Wang Y, Yu J, Zheng H, Yang Z (2023) Transrectal versus transperineal prostate biopsy in detection of prostate cancer: a retrospective study based on 452 patients. BMC Urol 23(1):11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12894-023-01176-y

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Zhang KS, Mayer P, Glemser PA, Tavakoli AA, Keymling M, Rotkopf LT et al (2023) Are T2WI PI-RADS sub-scores of transition zone prostate lesions biased by DWI information? A multi-reader, single-center study. Eur J Radiol 167:111026. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrad.2023.111026

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar