BACKGROUND AND AIMS Cardiovascular-kidney-metabolic (CKM) syndrome is a novel consensus defined by its multi-systemic and progressive nature. Circadian rhythm is a critical modulator of metabolic health. However, no previous studies assessed the associations between circadian alignment and CKM risk and outcomes.
METHOD This analysis utilized 2011-2014 NHANES data to examine adults (≥20 years) with cardiovascular-kidney-metabolic risk profiles. The circadian alignment evaluates the circadian light-activity synchronization through phasor analysis, which includes the assessment of phasor magnitude and acrophase. These parameters are subsequently categorized into quintiles for further study. Cross-sectional and longitudinal models were implemented to evaluate associations with CKM risk and adverse outcomes.
RESULTS 7,493 participants, representing 152,571,804 US adults (median 6.83-year follow-up). Participants with the shortest magnitude, characterized by the least overlap between light and activity cycles, not only have the highest risk of CKM (odds ratio [OR] 1.61, 95% CI 1.19–2.16) but also showed high all-cause mortality ([aHR] 1.84, 95% CI 1.37–2.47) and cardiovascular mortality (SHR 2.10, 95%CI 1.31–3.36). We observed a potential linear negative correlation between continuous phasor magnitude and the risk of CKM, as well as adverse outcomes (P-overall <0.001). Similar correlations were found in CVD, CKD, and DM separately. Males and older adults had elevated CKM incidence and all-cause/cardiovascular mortality versus female/younger counterparts. However, there was no statistical significance between phasor acorphase and CKM risk and adverse outcomes.
CONCLUSION Individuals with lower phasor magnitude, characterized by the least overlap between light and activity cycles, tend to have higher risks for CKM syndrome and adverse outcomes. These findings underscore quantifying circadian as a modifiable target for CKM primary prevention.
The authors have declared no competing interest.
Funding StatementThis study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No.82200500) and (No.82400407).
Author DeclarationsI confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.
Yes
The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:
Data in the present investigation was retrieved from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), which is a national, serial, one-time probability sampling design program to track health and nutrition patterns across age groups.The webste is:https://wwwn.cdc.gov/nchs/nhanes/default.aspx
I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.
Yes
I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).
Yes
I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines, such as any relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material, if applicable.
Yes
Footnotes↵† Denotes joint first author
↵* Denotes joint corresponding author
Comments (0)