Kurtz S, Ong K, Lau E, Mowat F, Halpern M (2007) Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89(4):780–785. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.F.00222

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Vince KG, Long W (1995) Revision knee arthroplasty; the limits of press fit medullary fixation. Clin Orthop Relat Res 317:172–177

Google Scholar 

Dalury DF, Pomeroy DL, Gorab RS, Adams MJ (2013) Why are total knee arthroplasties being revised? J Arthroplasty 28(8Suppl):120–121

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Bozic KJ, Kurtz SM, Lau E, Ong K, Chiu V, Vail TP, Rubash HE, Berry DJ (2010) The epidemiology of revision total knee arthroplasty in the United States. Clin Orthop Relat Res 468(1):45–51. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-009-0945-0

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Bozic KJ, Maselli J, Pekow PS, Lindenauer PK, Vail TP, Auerbach AD (2010) The influence of procedure volumes and standardization of care on quality and efficiency in total joint replacement surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 92(16):2643–52. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.I.01477

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Matsuda S, Lustig S, Van Der Merwe W (2017) Soft Tissue Balancing in Total Knee Arthroplasty. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-54082-4

Book  Google Scholar 

Parvizi J, Tan TL, Goswami K, Higuera C, Della Valle C, Chen AF, Shohat N (2018) The 2018 definition of periprosthetic hip and knee infection: an evidence-based and validated criteria. J Arthroplasty 33(5):1309-1314.e2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2018.02.078

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Engh GA, Parks NL (1997) The management of bone defects in revision total knee arthroplasty. Instr Course Lect 46:227–236

PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Rodríguez-Merchán EC (2019) The stiff total knee arthroplasty: causes, treatment modalities and results. EFORT Open Rev 4(10):602–610

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Coughlan A, Taylor F (2020) Classifications in brief: The McPherson classification of periprosthetic infection. Clin Orthop Relat Res 478(4):903–908

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Meneghini RM, Mont MA, Backstein DB, Bourne RB, Dennis DA, Scuderi GR (2015) Development of a modern knee society radiographic evaluation system and methodology for total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 30(12):2311–2314

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Lachiewicz PF, Bolognesi MP, Henderson RA et al (2012) Can tantalum cones provide fixation in complex revision knee arthroplasty? Clin Orthop Relat Res 470–1:199

Article  Google Scholar 

van Rensch PJH, Hannink G, Heesterbeek PJC, Wymenga AB, van Hellemondt GG (2020) Long-term outcome following revision total knee arthroplasty is associated with indication for revision. J Arthroplasty 35(6):1671–1677

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Baek JH, Lee SC, Jin H, Kim JW, Ahn HS, Nam CH (2021) Poor outcomes of revision total knee arthroplasty in patients with septic loosening compared to patients with aseptic loosening. J Orthop Surg Res 16(1):624

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Russo A, Cavagnaro L, Chiarlone F, Alessio-Mazzola M, Felli L, Burastero G (2022) Predictors of failure of two-stage revision in periprosthetic knee infection: a retrospective cohort study with a minimum two-year follow-up. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 142(3):481–490

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Belt M, Hannink G, Smolders J, Spekenbrink-Spooren A, Schreurs BW, Smulders K (2021) Reasons for revision are associated with rerevised total knee arthroplasties: an analysis of 8,978 index revisions in the dutch arthroplasty register. Acta Orthop. 92(5):597–601

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Cohen JS, Gu A, Lopez NS, Park MS, Fehring KA, Sculco PK (2018) Efficacy of revision surgery for the treatment of stiffness after total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review. J Arthroplasty. 33(9):3049–3055

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kim GK, Mortazavi SM, Purtill JJ, Sharkey PF, Hozack WJ, Parvizi J (2010) Stiffness after revision total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 25(6):844–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2010.04.001

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Phillips JRA, Al-Mouazzen L, Morgan-Jones R, Murray JR, Porteous AJ, Toms AD (2019) Revision knee complexity classification-RKCC: a common-sense guide for surgeons to support regional clinical networking in revision knee surgery. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 27(4):1011–1017

Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Briggs T (2012) Getting it right first time: improving the quality of orthopaedic care within the national health service in England. British Orthopaedic Association

Google Scholar 

Roof MA, Sharan M, Merkow D, Feng JE, Long WJ, Schwarzkopf RS (2021) High-volume revision surgeons have better outcomes following revision total knee arthroplasty. Bone Joint J 103-B(6 Supple A):131–136

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Halder AM, Gehrke T, Günster C, Heller K-D, Leicht H, Malzahn J, Niethard FU, Schräder P, Zacher J, Jeschke E (2019) Low hospital volume increases re-revision rate following aseptic revision total knee arthroplasty: an analysis of 23.644 cases. J Arthroplasty Churchill Livingstone S0883:31117–31119

Google Scholar