Technology-forcing to reduce environmental noise pollution: a prospectus

Meyer AF. An Overview of EPA’s Implementation of the Noise Control Act of 1972. J Air Pollut Control Assoc. 1974;24:830–1.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Shapiro SA. Lessons from a public policy failure: EPA and noise abatement. Ecol LQ. 1992;19:1.

Google Scholar 

Shapiro SA, Suter AH The dormant noise control act and options to abate noise pollution. Administrative Conference of the United States, 1991 https://scholar.archive.org/work/yghddnccezgrnih5sf4mc4bqbq/access/wayback/http://aireform.com/wp-content/uploads/19911100.-The-Dormant-Noise-Control-Act-Options-to-Abate-Noise-Pollution-S.Shapiro-34p.pdf (accessed 1 Jan2024).

Lang WW. The status of noise control regulations in the USA. Noise Control Eng. 1975;5:108–15.

Article  Google Scholar 

Lee J, Veloso FM, Hounshell DA, Rubin ES. Forcing technological change: A case of automobile emissions control technology development in the US. Technovation. 2010;30:249–64.

Article  Google Scholar 

McConnell V, Leard B. Pushing New Technology into the Market: California’s Zero Emissions Vehicle Mandate. Rev Environ Econ Policy. 2021;15:169–79.

Article  Google Scholar 

Ashford NA. An Innovation-Based Strategy for a Sustainable Environment. In: Hemmelskamp J, Rennings K, Leone F (eds). Innovation-Oriented Environmental Regulation. Physica-Verlag HD: Heidelberg, 2000, pp 67–107.

Shapiro SA. Rejoining the battle against noise pollution. Issues Sci Technol. 1993;9:73–79.

Google Scholar 

Blomberg LD, Schomer PD, Wood EW. The interest of the general public in a national noise policy. Noise Control Eng J. 2003;51:172.

Article  Google Scholar 

Themann CL, Masterson EA. Occupational noise exposure: A review of its effects, epidemiology, and impact with recommendations for reducing its burden. J Acoustical Soc Am. 2019;146:3879–905.

Article  Google Scholar 

Nelson DI, Nelson RY, Concha‐Barrientos M, Fingerhut M. The global burden of occupational noise‐induced hearing loss. Am J Ind Med. 2005;48:446–58.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Suter AH. Engineering controls for occupational noise exposure. Sound Vib. 2012;46:24–31.

Google Scholar 

Nachtegaal J, Festen JM, Kramer SE. Hearing Ability in Working Life and Its Relationship With Sick Leave and Self-Reported Work Productivity. Ear Hearing. 2012;33:94–103.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Picard M, Girard SA, Simard M, Larocque R, Leroux T, Turcotte F. Association of work-related accidents with noise exposure in the workplace and noise-induced hearing loss based on the experience of some 240,000 person-years of observation. Accid Anal Prev. 2008;40:1644–52.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Li C-M, Zhang X, Hoffman HJ, Cotch MF, Themann CL, Wilson MR. Hearing Impairment Associated With Depression in US Adults, National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2005-2010. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2014;140:293.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Shoham N, Lewis G, Favarato G, Cooper C. Prevalence of anxiety disorders and symptoms in people with hearing impairment: a systematic review. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2019;54:649–60.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Shukla A, Harper M, Pedersen E, Goman A, Suen JJ, Price C, et al. Hearing Loss, Loneliness, and Social Isolation: A Systematic Review. Otolaryngol–head neck surg. 2020;162:622–33.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

World Health Organization. Burden of disease from environmental noise: Quantification of healthy life years lost in Europe. World Health Organization. Regional Office for Europe: Copenhagen, Denmark, 2011.

Hammer MS, Swinburn TK, Neitzel RL. Environmental noise pollution in the United States: developing an effective public health response. Environ Health Perspect. 2014;122:115–9.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Kourieh A, Giorgis-Allemand L, Bouaoun L, Lefèvre M, Champelovier P, Lambert J, et al. Incident hypertension in relation to aircraft noise exposure: results of the DEBATS longitudinal study in France. Occup Environ Med. 2022;79:268–76.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Hao G, Zuo L, Weng X, Fei Q, Zhang Z, Chen L, et al. Associations of road traffic noise with cardiovascular diseases and mortality: Longitudinal results from UK Biobank and meta-analysis. Environ Res. 2022;212:113129.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

He S, Smargiassi A, Low N, Bilodeau-Bertrand M, Ayoub A, Auger N. Residential noise exposure and the longitudinal risk of hospitalization for depression after pregnancy: Postpartum and beyond. Environ Res. 2019;170:26–32.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Itzkowitz N, Gong X, Atilola G, Konstantinoudis G, Adams K, Jephcote C, et al. Aircraft noise and cardiovascular morbidity and mortality near Heathrow Airport: A case-crossover study. Environ Int. 2023;177:108016.

Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Saucy A, Schäffer B, Tangermann L, Vienneau D, Wunderli J-M, Röösli M. Does night-time aircraft noise trigger mortality? A case-crossover study on 24 886 cardiovascular deaths. Eur Heart J. 2021;42:835–43.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Stansfeld S, Clark C. Health Effects of Noise Exposure in Children. Curr Envir Health Rpt. 2015;2:171–8.

Article  Google Scholar 

Yale Law Journal. Forcing Technology: The Clean Air Act Experience. Yale Law J. 1979;88:1713.

Gerard D, Lave LB. Implementing technology-forcing policies: The 1970 Clean Air Act Amendments and the introduction of advanced automotive emissions controls in the United States. Technol Forecast Soc Change. 2005;72:761–78.

Article  Google Scholar 

Dijk M, Yarime M. The emergence of hybrid-electric cars: Innovation path creation through co-evolution of supply and demand. Technol Forecast Soc Change. 2010;77:1371–90.

Article  Google Scholar 

Taylor MR, Rubin ES, Hounshell DA. Regulation as the Mother of Innovation: The Case of SO2 Control. Law Policy. 2005;27:348–78.

Article  Google Scholar 

US Environmental Protection Agency. Air Quality System Data Mart. https://www.epa.gov/outdoor-air-quality-data (accessed 20 Oct 2023).

Los Angeles International Airport. California State Airport Noise Standards Quarterly Reports and Contour Maps. 2005. https://www.lawa.org/lawa-environment/noise-management/lawa-noise-management-lax/california-state-airport-noise-standards-quarterly-reports-and-contour-maps (accessed 15 Dec 2023).

Metropolitan Washington Airports Authority. Annual Aircraft Noise Reports for Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport and Washington Dulles International Airport. Metropolitan Washington Airports Authority: Washington D.C., 1997 https://www.flyreagan.com/about-airport/aircraft-noise-information/dca-reagan-national-annual-aircraft-noise-reports (accessed 18 Sep203AD).

City of Chicago. Airport Noise Management System Reports. City of Chicago: Chicago, IL, 2008 https://www.flychicago.com/community/ORDnoise/ANMS/Pages/ANMSreports.aspx (accessed 15 Sep 2023).

Wesseling JH, Farla JCM, Hekkert MP. Exploring car manufacturers’ responses to technology-forcing regulation: The case of California’s ZEV mandate. Environ Innov Societal Transit. 2015;16:87–105.

Article  Google Scholar 

Taylor MR, Rubin ES, Hounshell DA. Control of SO2 emissions from power plants: A case of induced technological innovation in the U.S. Technol Forecast Soc Change. 2005;72:697–718.

Article  Google Scholar 

Miller AS. Environmental regulation, technological innovation, and technology-forcing. Nat Resour Env’t. 1995;10:64.

Google Scholar 

Currie J, Walker R. What Do Economists Have to Say about the Clean Air Act 50 Years after the Establishment of the Environmental Protection Agency? J Econ Perspect. 2019;33:3–26.

Article  Google Scholar 

Ashford NA. The importance of taking technological innovation into account in estimating the costs and benefits of worker health and safety regulation. Harv Environ Law Rev. 1997;9:419–66.

Google Scholar 

Fleming GG. Trains, Planes, and Automobiles: Transportation Noise in the United States. The Bridge 2021; 51. https://trid.trb.org/view/1870823 (accessed 27 Oct2023).

Fidell S. A review of US aircraft noise regulatory policy. Acoustical Soc Am-Acoust Today. 2015;11:26–34.

Google Scholar 

GAO. Information on a Potential Mandated Transition to Quieter Airplanes. US Government Accountability Office: Washington, DC, 2020.

Fleming GG, de Lépinay I, Schaufele R. Environmental Trends in Aviation to 2050. In: Aviation & Environmental Outlook. International Civil Aviation Organization, 2022, p 8.

Graham WR, Hall CA, Vera Morales M. The potential of future aircraft technology for noise and pollutant emissions reduction. Transp Policy. 2014;34:36–51.

Article  Google Scholar 

Schlatter F, Piquerez A, Habermacher M, Ragettli MS, Röösli M, Brink M, et al. Validation of large scale noise exposure modelling by long-term measurements. Noise Mapp. 2017;4:75–86.

Article  Google Scholar 

Thacher JD, Poulsen AH, Raaschou-Nielsen O, Jensen A, Hillig K, Roswall N, et al. High-resolution assessment of road traffic noise exposure in Denmark. Environ Res. 2020;182:109051.

Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Ögren M, Barregard L. Road Traffic Noise Exposure in Gothenburg 1975–2010. PLoS ONE. 2016;11:e0155328.

Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Hammer MS, Fan Y, Hammer SS, Swinburn TK, Weber M, Weinhold D, et al. Applying a novel environmental health framework theory (I-ACT) to noise pollution policies in the United States, United Kingdom, and the Netherlands. J Environ Plan Manag. 2018;61:2111–32.

Article  Google Scholar 

King EA, Murphy E. Environmental noise – ‘Forgotten’ or ‘Ignored’ pollutant? Appl Acoust. 2016;112:211–5.

Article 

Comments (0)

No login
gif